If catchweights are suppossed to benefit the smaller fighter...

Told you he's an idiot. You point out Pac tried to drain him and they want to point out the fact Pac tried to drain him two MORE pounds. atsch

 

all you've done on this post is confirm that the 145 fight was cotto's idea.

 

cotto, just like floyd, could have disregarded the cw agreement.

 

The catchweight was Pacquiaos idea

143 was Pacquiaos idea (declared as medically unsafe)

Cotto compromised with 145

 

I know

Wouldn't want these guys as lawyers for me

You'd go in facing 10 years and end up on death row :rofl

 

People were screaming REMATCH at 154, but Pacquiao said his health was more important

 

:huh

 

bottom line, 145 was cotto's term.


....and back to topic.

if cw is such an advantage for the smaller fighter, why has there only been 2 fights of 13 high profile fight where the smaller fighter has came up on top????

This content is protected

 

i'm shocked that these anti-pac are taking a while or can't seem to come up with a clever direct answer to the question.

 

Nobody is saying he couldn't have, stop trying to argue points nobody is making to make it appear your're winning something. :verysad

 

Both of you know you cannot compare multiple fights from different periods with one common factor like that. Quit being stupid. Different fighters, different circumstances, you just can't compare them like that. And your question has been answered by multiple people on this thread, just because it's not something you want to hear doesn't mean they didn't answer.

 

Another answer to TS question. Yet he wants to bold the last sentence and only respond to that. atsch