If Cotto 'quit' v Margo, why did Hatton not quit v PBF??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Jul 30, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I know they are, but I'm not necessarily comparing them because they are so similar, I am looking at both instances individually and questioning why one is a 'quit' and one isn't. Do you not find it strange or worth considering at all?
     
  2. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Hatton fell over from the punch(s) he took just before - looked like his legs had gone to me. He tried to move to the side and it just didnt happen.

    Did Cotto quit? Technically no, his corner pulled him out. But they did that as he knew he was beaten and was taking knees to buy time. Cotto had "game over" written across his face. When Frazier was stopped by his corner he never spoke to them again. I bet Cotto was not unhappy about his corner's actions. Make of that what you will.
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Pacfan, are you blind as well? Hatton got hit flush with a vicious left hook straight to the temple(moments after being kd and sent head first into a turnbuckle). What you saw was a delayed reaction. He went down from the left hook. He was on his back for several minutes. Let's also not forget that the ref held Floyd back while Hatton was clearly defenseless and out on his feet; ready to hit the canvas. This is a ******ed example, and in no way helps your argument.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I find it strange that you think this is a valid comparison.
     
  5. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    If you compare Hattons stoppage and Cotto staying down after the first knee then we wouldn't be having this conversation, both men went down from fatigue and an acclumination of punches, you can see both are going to lose, the Cotto stoppage just looked more dramatic, more of a choice, retreating across the ring and falling at Margos knees.
     
  6. Cain

    Cain Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    Those two examples couldn't be more different. Hatton was knocked off his feet, and then as he tried to move backwards he fell over and the fight was stopped because he was clearly in no fit state to continue.

    Cotto was fine to carry on, his legs were good enough to carry him across the ring so he could voluntarily take another knee without even taking a shot, he just didn't want any more of Margarito and i don't blame him for it, but he could have carried on if he had the heart. I'm not saying he doesn't have heart at all, he showed heart by getting up at all, he just didn't have enough of it to see out the fight.
     
  7. fatdrunkenslob

    fatdrunkenslob Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,496
    0
    Nov 8, 2005
    Hatton was rocked so badly by the first punch he really couldn't tell up from down at that point. I think his legs just buckled when he tried to get away from Floyd's followup assault, he did not go down willingly. If you watch Hatton carefully when he's hurt he really loses his legs and stumbles all over the place.

    Cotto, on the other hand, has great balance even when hurt and is pretty good at not showing his pain when stunned. He's also much better(smarter) at surviving after getting badly hurt than someone like Hatton. He throws huge and accurate counters to keep people off of him when he is badly hurt rather than just backing up against the ropes with his hands up which has allowed him to survive guys like Torres.
    If you remember the Torres brawl, Cotto was probably several big shots from getting knocked out cold but never took a knee to buy time. In that fight it was still in the early rounds and he had full use of his legs and belief in his power which was clearly not the case vs. Margarito. Against Margo he was hurt several times in the fight and totally exhausted to the point where he couldn't even keep his hands up.
    I think a lesser fighter would have succumbed to the punishment much earlier and I was surprised he was able to last as long as he did and rally back at points to win(round 8 and most of round 10 till he was almost knocked out). What's probably more impressive is that Cotto is NOT a physically durable fighter like Clottey or Williams and survives often with just sheer determination.

    The bottomline is if Cotto has to take a knee he's completely finished already. He's just one of those fighters that can think well even when hurt and probably tried to buy some time sort of like Corrales did by spitting the mouthpiece out several times. Fortunately for him when he did it the second time his uncle was on the apron already and took the decision out of his hands.
     
  8. Sug3

    Sug3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,661
    17
    Nov 10, 2006
    What happend to cotto was karma from the beating he gave judah and the low blows he used on various opponents in the past whenenever he got in trouble,god works in mysterious ways.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It looked like his legs had gone. Looked like. We don't know what he felt. We don't know what Miguel Cotto felt either. Because Hatton's reason for going down manifested itself physically, he is not a quitter. What if Cotto had to go down because he had blurred vision from the headshots and couldn't see the punches coming, or was semi-conscious and was unsure of what was happening, or was swallowing so much blood he thought he was going to pass out because he couldn't breath, why can boxing fans not see a man go down on one knee and appreciate that he wouldn't do it unless he was in severe distress? If he had went down like Hatton did, why is that more acceptable? We cannot know and therefore cannot say that he was in as much pain or had more or less of a grip on his faculties at that moment, as we simply do not know. We should not condemn a fighter because we don't know why he had to go down. People should have learned that lesson from Gerald McClennan. Fighters only drop to a knee when they have to, when they are in severed distress. We should recognize and respect that, not lambast them for it.
     
  10. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I'll say it again for all of you that keep harping on about how different the situations are:

    I am not saying they are the same situation, I am drawing attention to the circumstances that meant one instance was labelled a 'quit' and one wasn't, to try and show how the quit allegation is absurd.

    How can we judge how fit Hatton and/or Cotto were to continue? We don't know what injuries Cotto had sustained or how he was reacting to it physically, same as we don't with Hatton. If Cotto had dropped to the floor in the clinch after he had got up the 1st fight and stayed down, would he then not be a quitter? This is the question I am asking.
     
  12. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    it's amazing how people have brought hatton into the discussion regarding this fight.there was another post the other day titled where did margarito's win leave hatton! now they're mentioning hatton and quitting in the same sentence because some perceive that cotto quit! what's ricky got to do with all this?
     
  13. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    There is no comparison to be made, in one instance the ref stepped in and decided for the fighter and his team. In the other the fighter took two voluntary knees, looked at his corner and they bailed him out.
     
  14. Cain

    Cain Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Jul 28, 2008
    Hatton couldn't have continued even if he wanted to. Cotto could have. It's as simple as that.
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I'll repeat it for the 5,000th time then:

    I am not comparing them. They are different situations.

    What I am saying is that Hatton went down when it was not the direct immediate result of a punch that caused him to overbalance and fall. He saw Mayweather coming at him again and went down. I am only asking the question, why is Cotto taking a knee and attempting to go on with the fight an example of quitting, and Hatton going down not quitting? Is it purely because the referee stepped in? Doesn't that highlight how tenuous and ill-founded and stupid the 'quit' slur is? That only a technicality over how the fight ended (by ref or by corner) determines whether a man is labelled a quitter or not?