Most or many media outlets had Crawford at #1 for awhile before they got a clue. Now they have Fraudnelo at #1 even though Inoue and Usyk are clear 1a and 1b. But would a KO over a name like Porter prove that Crawford is ultra legit and move him back to #1?
Whoever had him at 1 should be ashamed of themselves and no a win over Porter even if its by KO doesnt make him number one . If he wants that spot or to be in the conversation he needs to beat Spence nothing else will do it
P4P is such nonsense worthless meaningless nonsense why do people talk about it. It holds no historical value and will never. Crawford finally steps up at the end of his career and fights a live dog at welterweight who he'll probably beat well based on style, he deserves a medal and kiss off the queen herself.
Usyk is top 5 P4P now Maybe top 3 Clenelo Crawford Usyk Timestamped This content is protected Crawford's best win still to this day in 37 fights is Postol, beating Porter even by KO might be enough to actually warrant him his top 5 place but #2 or #3?
I feel like Porter had lost a touch when he fought Ugas tbh. He did look better against Spence though. Crawford weight bullied at 140 and below and at 147 all he has fought is average Horn, and two shot Brits - one forgets defence, and the other with broken eye socket syndrome. Crawford's never been top 5 p4p and never will, he's 34/35 and he's probably already on the slide. We just haven't seen it yet because he's cherrypicked his way at 147.
Holy ****. The guy on the right is Sean Zittel from FightHype. He should be cast in a Quasimodo origin film.
How does beating Porter making number #1? It would be his best win. By that Logic shouldn’t Spence be top 3 right now?