If dirrell hit froch with "effective" punches all night....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009.


  1. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Then why was the cobras face not damaged?? Face it, white people bleed,bruise, and cut easy......

    And to those that say froch landed nothing, then why was direll bleeding, and looking the way he did after the fight?

    :think

    Effective punching my ass. Carl got rocked a bit, but dirrell was never able to close the show, and carl looked fine after the fight. You cant take a champ's belt without even marking him :-(
     
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    #1
  2. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    Re-watch the fight if you need and in slow motion preferably cause Dirrell tagged Froch all night.

    His face being marked or not doesn't change that fact !!!
     
    pasky2000, Oct 17, 2009
    pasky2000, Oct 17, 2009
    #2
  3. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    I think people fell in love with dirrell's boxing skills, and at times it was good, but for me it ws only good enough for 6 rounds, and the point deduction was justified after he held more then a new born baby holds its mother...
     
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    Jeff Young, Oct 17, 2009
    #3
  4. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    The newest way to score a fight: The man with the least cuts and bruises.

    I applaud you :good
     
    TFFP, Oct 17, 2009
    TFFP, Oct 17, 2009
    #4
  5. Vengeance

    Vengeance Certified Headhunter Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Mar 13, 2009
    Well, it's good to see a fighter win a boxing match based on punching air, bad footwork, bodyslamming and rabbit punching.. you know.. the fundamentals of boxing...
     
    Vengeance, Oct 17, 2009
    Vengeance, Oct 17, 2009
    #5
  6. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    im talking about whos punches were more effective. And carl was plodding foward with no regard for dirrells power, with his hands low on the inside, and has no marks on his face after the fight.

    I dont think his punches were THAT effective.

    The only time they were really effective was when carl rushed into them like a dumbass. Man somone needs to teach that guy who to fight :yep
     
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    #6
  7. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Im not saying he didnt land, im just saying that people who are saying dirrell landed the much more effective punches are wrong. I think it was a close fight
     
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    #7
  8. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    Didn't see the fight but it sounds a bit like the Golden Boy vs Tito.
     
    Akxtinguish, Oct 17, 2009
    Akxtinguish, Oct 17, 2009
    #8
  9. VanillaKilla

    VanillaKilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,611
    1
    Oct 31, 2008
    Its good to see constant backing up(not circling) and alot of holding. :lol:

    Dirrell goes in for a clinch - Cmon man plz stop puncing

    Carl breaks a hand free and starts throwing - Get the **** off me ***, this is a boxing match not a gay disco !

    Dirrell crying to the ref - WTF, i thought he wasnt allowed to try to hit me when i hug! :hey

    Those truly are, the fundamentals of boxing.

    And btw bad footwork,body slamming, and rabbit punching is what the fundamentals of boxing actually are.

    Read about the old bareknuckle days. Im not justifying it, im just finding your statment ironic :yep
     
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    VanillaKilla, Oct 17, 2009
    #9