If DLH Isn't a HOF'er, Mosley Isn't Either!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by southpaw1974, Jan 5, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Warfist

    Warfist Active Member Full Member

    942
    0
    Apr 30, 2007
    Mosley is a known juicer. That is extremely disrespectful and a huge slap in the face to the sport. He should never be allowed into the HOF imo. He did/does have some real talent though...it's just a shame that he couldn't resist the urge to gain an extra edge and had to taint his legacy so badly.
     
    Warfist, Jan 6, 2009
    Warfist, Jan 6, 2009
    #16
  2. houseboy

    houseboy Keyboard Warrior Full Member

    618
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    ODLH is in. Definitely a 1st ballot HOF'er.
     
    houseboy, Jan 6, 2009
    houseboy, Jan 6, 2009
    #17
  3. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    They both are first ballot HOFers for some years now.
     
    catasyou, Jan 6, 2009
    catasyou, Jan 6, 2009
    #18
  4. southpaw1974

    southpaw1974 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,710
    0
    Jul 22, 2004
    It's good to see that we have some intelligent posters on here that agree that they are both Hall of Famers. I agree that De La Hoya won the second fight with Mosley. I wasn't saying that Norton was a bum, he just doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame. The Hall of Fame in any sport should be reserved for special people. Lastly, I agree with Warfist that it's a shame that Mosley used roids --it has tained his legacy to a degree.
     
    southpaw1974, Jan 7, 2009
    southpaw1974, Jan 7, 2009
    #19
Page 2 of 2