If Enzo makes 175lbs, does this Hurt Haye's "Legacy"?

Haye has no legacy

Enzo was bum fraud paper champ who would have never held a title had it not been handed to him.

 

Enzo use to be an extremely good fighter until David Haye ruined him acctually.

 

Stupid questionatsch **** man why the hell is everyone so concerned with status, and legacy, and contracts, and who's ducking whom, and p4p this, and this guys resume is better then that guys, and blahblah freaking blah. Guys boxing is a sport not a popularity contest. Who gives a ****?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

why because Haye couldnt make 175

 

Enxo was trahs before that.
I think Enzo geting KO'd by a guy with 6 KO's showed it was smoked.

Also why Monte Barret was paid NOT to fight his next fight after loosing to Haye.

 

Byrd started out as a middleweight too, didn't he? Guess that's two big strikes against Wlad's legacy.

Well no, of course not, that'd be a bloody stupid thing for me to say. As is this question about Enzo making 175 hurting Haye.

 

like wins over Holyfield are degrading everybody legacy because he was blown up CW

... or better - PAC is blown up 116lbr so beating him gives zero legacy to any true WW

 

Byrd's lowest ever weigh in weight as a pro was in his debut fight : 169lbs which is a lightheavyweight not a middleweight. I do believe he may have been able to make the 168lbs for a while , but I doubt that for long.
What he was capable of was making the 175lbs mark , which he didn't want to do for some reason , maybe because it was easier for him being an elusive HW , rather than a versatile LHW.

 

Fail.

 

deal