if floyd doesn't accept the 14 day cut off, is he to blame?

now, i have been siding with mayweather all along in the debate on who's fault it is for the fight not happening, but i'm sorry if pacquiao accepts the 14 day cut off, and floyd still refuses the fight, then in my opinion he's scared. 14 days is enough, it's right in the middle of what was negotiated, and i find that very fair.

will your opinions favour floyd in who's to blame if he refuses the 14 day cut off?

 

almost the same thread with just added option for the poll.

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=228285

 

oh in that case mods can delete this one.

 

this will be a shut out.

 

Clearly he is. Many blamed Pac for not accepting 14 days before, despite accepting 24 days which is better than 40 of PBF previous opponents. Now the situation is reversed. This fight will never get made if people keeps moving the posts. 14 days is perfectly fine and no logical fan can honestly think Pac wants 14 days so he can squeeze 14 days of drug usage and have it flushed out by fight night too.

If fighters really wanted to reap the benefits of PED's, they would do it off season, not start cycle 14 days before the fights in the midst of unlimited random urine testing and blood testing post fight.

 

Yes, it is Floyd's fault, the stupid ****er he is. He's my favourite boxer but he's pissing me off with all this flaffing about.

People seem to have overlooked that Mayweather has described Pacquiao as 'extraordinary' in the context of his progression. To me that says alot about how Floyd regards his game, regardless of whether he used that expression to peddle the drug slurs against him. It says to me that PBF knows he would be a very hard fight.

 

Yeah.

 

If ever anyone is making another poll please make it public.

 

It's always been Floyd's fault. Anybody who can't see the duck move is blind - whether willfully or due to ignorance.

 

Of course he is. It will be a black mark on his career if he ducks Pac now.

 

I made the mistake of going to this thread
its crawling with *******s

 

PBF vs. SSM went off perfectly. It was an example on how to clean up boxing and insure no drug use in training for fights. W/ this as the example all fights should follow the same protocol. I want to see the fight, and I'm not a *****, just I think all disputed fights should agree the olympic testing......case closed. What if pac beats him, then floyd goes running his mouth about a 14 day cutoff allowed pac to use juice. He would be the master of discrediting pac accomplishment. I think as long as both fighters are subject to the same rules the testing is fair. I can't think of one reason why a clean fighter wouldn't want to be testing in an olympic style.

 

whatever, april 2010 veterans.:yep

 

it did not stop floyd senior from accusing pacquiao before, why do you tink it would stop them from accusing pac now? senior has already come out on record that even if pac stopped from using a-side meth, he is already having its effect in his body.

 

Floyd did not ask for a 14 day window...