If floyd finishes off with ortiz, khan and pac - will he have fulfilled his promise?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jul 30, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yes if he beats these 3 I think a lot of criticism will be moot.
     
  2. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009

    Langford did not beat anyone resembling Vitali. Heavyweight back then isn't heavyweight now.

    Precisely what was the highest weight he fought and won a title at? I want the pounds so we can compare. Also we have SRR we can look at. But besides these two, are you saying there are others who would be higher than Floyd or Pacquiao if they go on the path they are set on?
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    Harry wills was number 1 contender then as was jeanette and maybe even mcvey for a short while. Vitali is number 1 contender now.

    In the 200's and he won the coloured heavyweight title.

    Off the top of my head, the guys i'd put above either of these two providing they finish with my expected fights (floyd: ortiz, khan, pac. Pac: jmm, bradley, floyd)

    Fitz
    Langford
    Robinson
    Greb
    Louis
    Armstrong
    Charles
    Pep
    Ali
    Duran
    Gans
    B. Leonard
    Walker
    Ross

    After them we're talking the likes of leonard, whittaker, moore, tunney, burley. That's the bracket I see pac and floyd ending up in.
     
  4. Boxmaster

    Boxmaster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,231
    11
    Aug 15, 2009
    Explain why Ali, Loius, Pep, Gans, Charles and Ross would rank higher because I disagree with you on these picks.

    I think Holyfield in terms of resume ranks higher than Ali. I think Ali only ranks high because of charisma and what he did for boxing and not his actual resume. What I'm saying is I think Holyfield is the greatest living heavyweight, and I think it's based on resume and the fact that Holyfield is still beating guys and still at the elite level somehow.

    Duran, Robinson, Fitz, Langford, Armstrong, I can agree on these that it's going to be really difficult for anyone to ever surpass them.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    The names no ali's resume such as foreman, liston, patterson, moore, frazier, shavers norton it's just a who's who of the heavyweight scene from the late 50's to the late 70's. To come back the way he did after his enforced absence and subsequent losses against the man who turned frazier and norton into bouncing balls is ridiculously amazing. Second greatest heavyweight in history.

    Louis is the most dominant champion in recorded history, really needs no explanation.

    Pep for about 5 years couldn't be hit with a punch and is the greatest featherweight in history holding victories against the second greatest featherweight in history.

    Gans is the second greatest lightweight in history and depending on further research could actually be regarded above duran with an amazing 17 defences plus a disputed draw against jersey joe.

    Charles holds victories over elite atg's such as burley, moore and louis. From 160 above he is one of the greatest in history.

    Ross defeated great lightweights in his reign and went on to become a dominant welterweight champion, he basically did what pea did but just a bit better.

    Having holyfield as the goat at hw is something I can not understand at all.
     
  6. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Yeah, this is exactly how I would expect it to play-out, extensive HATE til he beats the next guy and so on & so on...

    Think about what just happened here in these three post. If Floyd beats Ortiz, Khan and Pac Right. All 3 are Belt Holders and Pac is supposed to be, (according to all the experts, especially the experts in Boxing Forums LOL) the "chosen-one" to destroy FMJ right? But this is still not enough in their opinion. Then he has to beat Martinez and even then (according to one poster) if Martinez is showing his age, Floyd gets no credit. So I would Imagine someone will eventually bring up the the winner of the Super 6 or whom-ever is SMW Champ by the time FMJ beats the previously mentioned fighters and by then if Alvarez and Chavez jr. are still undefeated then of course FMJ will be accused of ducking them and being scared. FMJ is a fighter that only fights once a year, so for him to defeat the fighters "they want him to beat" he would be well into is 40's...yet people would say that he still needs to beat this guy and that guy to prove that he is the best :-(.

    I know that I a new poster to this whole forum stuff, but what I have come to learn about debating the career of Floyd Mayweather whether in a forum or anywhere else, It's just Pointless! Because few people (if any) rarely debates Floyd objectively, it's all based on Pure Hate!
     
  7. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I wan't him to face Martinez also.
     
  8. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,052
    24,037
    Feb 19, 2007
    thats because floyd gives you a whole lot to hate. dont complain that he does it to sell fights and then call it unfair when he gets what he is after. there is no doubt that floyd has been taking the path of least resistance, for whatever reason you want to believe. if he ends his career like the ts is suggesting, i for one, will give him a pass on the percieved ducking of challenges in the past.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    Good post but a bit far fetched regarding credibility.

    The issue is floyd has the skillset to be an elite great or an atg or whatever label you want. Watch him fight and his skills are clear. Compare his resume and achievements across history and it doesn't quite match up with the true elites. That being said he's on the cusp and is only a couple of names short.

    First it was freitas and tzyu, then it was cotto and margo, now it's the lineup I suggest.

    People go to extremes of course they do. But if they persist after what would be floyd beating the best two ww's and the best lww no need to bother with them. Especially if they claim it after beating martinez!

    Right now i'd say floyd's amongst the best 40 in history. This lineup puts him in the top 15 due to a combination of things imo.
     
  10. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Once you said this..I stopped reading:-(.
     
  11. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Pac is enough (due to how high he is currently ranked). Anything else is icing on the cake, IMO.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    So you're saying you wouldn't call floyd a true elite great if his resume was as it is apart from replacing sosa and brussels with freitas and tzsyu?

    Floyd is only a couple of wins from having an elite resume that stands up to his peers.

    You haters can claim he's still miles off but it just aint true.
     
  13. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I don't really blame Floyd for not fighting Popo and Tszyu. Sometimes fights just don't happen because of timing, politics, etc...But at the same time, I'm not going to credit him either.

    Beating a fellow great like Manny would do a lot for legacy, it would put him as #1 in this era (whatever an era really means), and Ortiz and Khan would help as well. But I think he wasted time doing nothing.

    Seriously, do people look at Ortiz & Khan and think they are better than guys like 2008 versions of Cotto, the Plastered *******, and Williams? Floyd worked hard to get into a position where he had the negotiating leverage to command big fights, but has only one quality win since the end of 2007. That hurts his legacy, no matter if he beats Khan and Ortiz.
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,822
    22,047
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm not saying I blame him neither. I just think fighting them two would have him top 15 now. Same as fighting 2 of marg/williams/cotto instead of retiring.

    Considering the circumstance of ortiz and khan and how they're currently ranked as well as their potential to achieve more in the future, I think it's fair to say history could view these two above the ww's listed earlier.
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'm not big on the WW division right now. It was excellent 3-4 years ago, but Ortiz is merely a good but flawed guy, as well as Khan, who is still @ 140 right now. People are big on 140 but I think it's a good division more so because of parity rather than the talent level.

    The division was stronger in 2007-08, and Floyd wasted his time from 2008-on doing little. I think that hurt his legacy, because he was in a position where could demand big fights and get it, but didn't fight in 2008, had one fight against a LW in 2009, and had a good win in 2010 but has done nothing since.

    Floyd is my favorite active fighter to watch, I think he is absolutely beautiful to watch in the ring, but I feel he wasted some of his legacy due to whatever reason. Business tactics, fear of losing, lack of desire, whatever.

    Floyd fighting Manny would do a lot for the legacy of the winner.