If Floyd runs he will lose in points, if he engage he will get KOed...

If a *******s posts, it's not worth reading

 

The OP said it exactly as it would happen except for one thing.
Floyd won't fight, so the OP's thread will never be proven right.

 

Floyd doesn't need the balls to use his face as his defense like Margarito did, he's skilled enough to make Manny miss and hit him. Clottey doesn't fight like Floyd. He just stand in one spot with his high guard defense and let Manny threw 100 punches per rounds. Floyd would move forward, move backward, feints, jabs, counter punch, and outwit Manny.

 

How would Manny beat Floyd when Floyd is one of the best at neutralizing his opponents best weapons and limit their power punches landing? Manny isn't a good jabber, and Marquez did a good job of neutralizing Manny's power punches landed.

 

Like I said plenty of times, if Floyd thought it was that simple, he would've collected his easy 100 mil payday 2 years ago.

 

LOL..FLOYD WILL BE ABLE TO "BOX OFF THE FRONT FOOT" OR "BOX OFF THE BACK FOOT"...

HE'LL ALSO BE ABLE TO TAKE MANNY AND PUT HIM IN WATERS HE IS NOT COMFORTABLE IN WHICH IS FIGHTING ON THE INSIDE..

NO REASON FOR FLOYD TO WORRY ABOUT A FIGHTER WHO "RUNS IN"

SEE VIDEO BELOW

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtARRrX2FXQ[/ame]


THE ORIGINAL FIGHTER AT WW TO "BEAT FLOYD" WAS PREDICTED AS A BIG WW, IN HIS PRIME, WITH GOOD SPEED, AND LONG ARMS..

PAC SHOWS UP AND THE ABOVE IS ALL BUT LIFTED FROM EVERY FORUM OUT THEIR:huh...........HMMMM:think

AGAIN...AS THE HATERS PUT IT BEFORE PAC SHOWED UP TO 47..IT WILL TAKE A BIG WW (FIGHTER), IN HIS PRIME, WITH GOOD SPEED, AND LONG ARMS TO BEAT FLOYD.:deal

 

Or it could be that if Bob and Roach thought it was that simple, then the fight would've happen already.

“It’s a complicated game plan I was beginning to put together. You look at the way Floyd fights. If you put pressure on him, on the ropes, he rolls and ducks, and counters and if you get too aggressive, he’ll walk you so cleverly onto a counter punch. He’s not the most offensive fighter, not the most entertaining fighter, but he is great at what he does.”
“Do we have to be ready for all of it ? Yes. It’s going to be a real, real, mental fight, and this is 100 per cent the biggest challenge Manny Pacquiao has ever faced.”


Would Roach have done anything different to Mayweather’s style, if he had trained him? “A little bit more offence, because of his hand speed and abilities. I’d have got him to use it to his advantage more. I don’t think anyone trains Mayweather. He was born to fight. It is in his blood.”
“There are not a lot of weaknesses. It has to be a special 36 minutes from Manny. We have to fight the perfect fight.” - FREDDIE ROACH






http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/sport/garethadavies/100005029/freddie-roach-exclusive-mayweather-so-good-pacquiao-would-need-%E2%80%98perfect-fight%E2%80%99/

 

Floyd will be able to "steal angels" that Pac takes off him.

WHAT IM SAYIN IS THAT MANNY IS GREAT AT STEALING ANGELS..HE LITERALLY SIDE STEPS SO QUICK THAT HE IS RIGHT NEXT TO YOU, WHILE YOUR LOOKING AT WHERE HE USED TO BE..........

FLOYD KNOWS HOW TO DROP THAT BACK FOOT ABOUT 45-90 DEGREES AND TAKE THAT ANGLE RIGHT BACK, PLUS POP YOU IN THE MOUTH AT THE SAME TIME.

 

dude,,
do you see the reaction everytime pbf is asked about pacquio?! how worries about his "0" L everytime he thinks of fighting pacquio!

I need a tune up fight..
After the fight and pacquio is waiting in the wings what do we hear?!
I lost my urge....afterwards...I'm on vacation:rofl

 

Yeah! I know Floyd knows a lot about boxing especially on preserving his "0"s. No Cotto, No Margarito and once upon a time there was Paul Williams. ALL of them were/are legit 147's but none of them were in the list. Yes, he doesn't take risks that is why despite his "0" loss pac is more popular than him.

 

No I do not..

Thats an opinion u forumulated...

SEE THE VIDEO ON WHY A PURE BOXER/SHARP SHOOTER IS NOT SCAED.

BASING YOUR OPINION OFF OF "INTERVIEWS ALONE" SHOWS ME YOUR ARGUMENT IS VERY VERY WEAK:deal

TRY AGAIN WITH MORE TO BACK IT-MY VIDEO OUTDOES YOUR "HAVE YOU SEEN FLOYD IN INTERVIEWS":rofl

Not a part time boxing fan man..I watch all divisions from 105 up, INCLUDING amatuers:deal

:hat

 

bro your so far off thread topic-YOUR REACHING FOR EXCUSES SHOWS ME EVERYTHING U GOT IS BASED ON YOUR OPINION AND NOT FACTUAL ITEMS..

PW WAS NEVER DUCKED NEITHER WAS TONY.

U HAVE A CASE AS TO "HE DUCKED COTTO" BUT THOSE OTHER 2 GUYS..LMFAO HELL NO.

PW WAS NEVER IN POSITION-MARGARITO WAS TOLD HE'D GET A SHOT IF HE KEPT WINNING-HE LOST HIS FIGHT TO PW THUS THERE GOES THAT ARGUMENT.:deal

Don't come at me with little kiddy fukin debates..try to get some hard info and then we can debate..TILL THEN UR JUST POSTING UR OPINION WITH LITTLE TO BACK IT:hat

 

dude,

Mayweather has been 147's for ages...Pac only recently. Pac has more meaningful fights than Mayweather for 147lbs. Let me guess you are proud of Mayweather's accomplishment which happened 5 yrs ago.. his win over Baldomir!:rofl

 

Bump....

 

Pacquiao had trouble with Marquez because Marquez is a counter puncher. Now imagine a taller, faster, better counter puncher with a reach advantage... That's Floyd Mayweather. Not saying Floyd Mayweather is the best fighter ever, but he certainly has all the tools to beat Pacquiao. It's incredibly obvious.