If Floyd Was A Career Offensive Fighter And Was Brutally KO'D 2 Years Ago...

It could have ended his career thats why they tested him on his first fight back with rios, he passed with flying colours but i did not say he was proven because rios was not really a real challange for a pac (even.a damaged one). His rematch with bradley proved alot, he beat bradley more convincingly the 2nd time around, overall looked better and this was against bradley, the p4p #3-5 who was coming off a win against JMM

algieri is a decent win but would not write home about it

 

Here here. If floyd loses its not what id idealy like to see but if floyd had to lose to anyone then pac deserves to be that guy

 

pac beat Bradley more convincingly in the first fight shut him out B11-1 in the first fight the second was also a shut out but not like the first

 

Fighting for 30 seconds a round?. I had pac winning a close but competitive fight by 2 clear rounds. An i watched it in a pub full of manny fans screaming for every shot

 

Where's your source? Proof? Or is this all assumption?

 

nice trolling

even the mayweathers had it a shut out its was a robbery of the highest order you just proved to me you are a troll

close ahhahaha **** you:nut

 

see you are a ***** logic doesn't work with you

 

Mayweather won like 10 of 12 rounds vs cotto but almost all were competitive. you can 12-0 someone an still be competitive u goose

the point is he beat a prime bradley who was p4p 3 comfortably and pac is p4p 2 because of it

Damaged fighters dont do that, he has slipped sure but he aient close to shot

 

You can't score fights for ****. Nobody had 11-1 Pacquiao. You won't score May 2nd properly either.

 

Who did you axed?

 

I think ledermen had it wide as hell for pac, i remember his card flashin on the screen an thinkin "wtf did he watch?"

 

Prove it. In order to refuse it needs to be offered.

 

I initially had it 9-3 on my first viewing. About 8-4 later. Close rounds for sure.