If Floyd went to down 135 to fight Marquez would you still be mad?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by eze, May 3, 2009.


Page 7 of 7
  1. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    I'm sorry, but this ****** needs to be ignored.....he understands the issue of weight and the reasons for weight classes perfectly.....but in his love of Mayweather, refuses to admit that a JMM-Mayweather match at Welter would be a huge advangtage for Mayweather.......

    Ignore this *******, he's doing what he does best in this forum, and that is to troll!
     
    divac, May 3, 2009
    divac, May 3, 2009
    #91
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    :rofl:rofl:rofl Good Job replying to my comment. of course Im a noob to you cause you cant reply to my comment.

    Why does Marquez need to bulk?


    YOUR A NOOB.. Thats all you got.

    Lmao. Dumbass fool.

    I bet you think Cotto-Pacquaio is fairer than Marquez-Floyd.
     
    eze, May 3, 2009
    eze, May 3, 2009
    #92
  3. Wige247

    Wige247 Active Member Full Member

    1,080
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    I think the weight issue is less important than people are making it out to be.

    Whether PBF fights @ 140 or 154, he's coming to the ring @ 145-148. JMM & his supporters want the lower weight b/c they want PBF drained for the fight, while he can be comfortable making weight.
     
    Wige247, May 4, 2009
    Wige247, May 4, 2009
    #93
  4. Wige247

    Wige247 Active Member Full Member

    1,080
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    This post should be framed for the set-in-stone truth that it preaches...:good
     
    Wige247, May 4, 2009
    Wige247, May 4, 2009
    #94
  5. jpjp7

    jpjp7 Member Full Member

    344
    0
    Nov 22, 2008
    VicD called out pac before :yep:yep:yep
     
    jpjp7, May 4, 2009
    jpjp7, May 4, 2009
    #95
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch Another gem from the resident idiot....
     
    Lance_Uppercut, May 4, 2009
    Lance_Uppercut, May 4, 2009
    #96
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Your comment was asinine you moron... :patsch
     
    Lance_Uppercut, May 4, 2009
    Lance_Uppercut, May 4, 2009
    #97
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004


    So if someone moves up from 130 to 135 THEY MUST bulk?

    Is that what you are saying/

    ****ing idiot. GO troll *********** you dont belong here.
     
    eze, May 4, 2009
    eze, May 4, 2009
    #98
  9. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Where is the rule that you must bulk your body to move up in weight?
     
    eze, May 4, 2009
    eze, May 4, 2009
    #99
  10. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004




    Lol
     
    eze, May 4, 2009
    eze, May 4, 2009
    #100
Page 7 of 7