If Floyd would have fought Hatton at his hometown and at 140lbs.....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Legend2, May 23, 2010.


  1. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    Mayweather at 140 even quicker and sharper and hit harder and basically would have ripped Hatton up a lot worse than what he did at 147. At 140 it would have been a massacre and almost sickening to watch.

    Hatton fans who still talk up Rickys chances are the biggest cocksuckers in the world.
     
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    So him dehydrating further gave him more power than dehydrating less?

    And despite weighing the same against Mayweather as when he fights at 140?
     
  3. pretty boy

    pretty boy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,621
    2
    Jun 30, 2009
    Yes. Mayb quicker as at 140 floyd was a beast. More agressive with fast powerful combinations.
     
  4. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    8,804
    1
    Mar 11, 2010
    Well said! Boring as ****, the only exciting fights he had were the ones he got his ass whooped in. Left hand hug, left hand hug, left hand hug! Absolute shite.

    And the **** his fans talk is embaressing
     
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Same goes for Mayweather's who punch output was greater at 140 than 147.
     
  6. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    586
    0
    May 11, 2010
    :good
     
  7. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    Lol you think Hatton was much faster and stronger at 147 then he was at 140 ?
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I don't think he was slower.

    He didn't weigh the 160 against Mayweather that he was against Collazo.

    He was the same weight as if he was fighting at 140.

    I just don't see how him cutting more weight would make him faster, it would only hurt him.
     
  9. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    586
    0
    May 11, 2010
    I've already proven to *******s over and over again that Hatton was in better shape at 147 than at 140. These guys are immune to facts.
     
  10. luilun

    luilun New Member Full Member

    6
    0
    May 14, 2010
    Hatton wins and here's why he's allowed to push and hold ,also smaller ring and no Xylocaine. In Vegas the ring was like 24x24 Cortez broke up all the inside fighting and Floyds hands would be hurting by round 6
     
  11. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    Yes.
     
  12. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Even with the inside fighting, Mayweather was doing better.


    Floyd wasn't using Xylocaine against Hatton. He would of tested positive for it.

    Mayweather would of thrown more punches getting Hatton even further at bay.

    Floyd beats Hatton faster.
     
  13. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    586
    0
    May 11, 2010
    Hatton was in Floyd's face the entire night so the ring size point is moot. Floyd killed Hatton on the inside AND outside and Xylocaine is more ******* bull****. Floyd KOs Hatton at any weight.
     
  14. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,487
    5
    Jun 5, 2008
    eze just answer me this, what was Hattons best weight ? 140 or 147 ?
     
  15. zfc

    zfc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    91
    May 1, 2009
    Hatton fought Pac at Hattons strongest weight and look what happened to him!!!