If Froch beats Kessler..Calzaghe is silenced

Honestly, who ****ing cares?

 

What does it mean if by some miracle Kessler makes Froch look bloody awful?

 

I corrected your post to reflect reality.

 

Froch would have lost to a prime Reid. This is 100% and evident in his fight with a shot Reid.

Froch would perhaps lose to Sakio Bika (50/50). Froch is better than Bika, but Bika matches up very well. Chinny with a sneaky right hand and good conditioning.

Some people might claim Hopkins schools an inheritantly flawed fighter like Froch.

31 year old Eubanks beats Froch.

Mitchell, Woodhall and Brewer? Difficult to pick a winner if they fight Froch.

 

:think

And what if Kessler coming of a bad loss beats Carl by a margin?

I really can understand why people dont like Calzaghe and half of his 20 odd defenses were substandard. But the fact remains even on his off nights he won and a dozen or so of his title fights were legitimate. Carl has had 4 legitimate title fights, lost 1 won and nearly lost 2 others.

I have always been a huge Froch fan but I have always known he is a limited fighter even though he has all the heart in the world and is far better to watch than Joe.

Head to head Calzaghe would have beaten him 7 days a week and twice on sundays.

 

Where does this put Froch losing to a shot Kess???:hi:

 

Wow!:admin
Thats all kinds of one sided.

 

Well this proved to be a complete fail. Nice going Jeff