If further proof were needed that alphabet rankings are crazy.......

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Beeston Brawler, Jun 29, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006

    Frank does well to get his fighters WBO rankings. Jamie Moore not being ranked by the WBO is a bit naughty really. Read into that what you want.
     
    UndisputedUK, Jun 29, 2009
    UndisputedUK, Jun 29, 2009
    #16
  2. BigEars

    BigEars Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,766
    2
    Sep 30, 2006
    The eyes of the blind aren't much use.
     
    BigEars, Jul 2, 2009
    BigEars, Jul 2, 2009
    #17
  3. Laikaka

    Laikaka Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Nov 4, 2008
    Accept it? Their ratings alone are enough to discredit the alphabets but only if they are made an issue of. Surely that is the job of the boxing journalists and most (including Steve Bunce) aren't even interested, quite possibly because fans don't seem care.
     
    Laikaka, Jul 2, 2009
    Laikaka, Jul 2, 2009
    #18
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Alphabet rankings can be totally absurd. So many times their mandatories are insane.
     
    Farmboxer, Jul 2, 2009
    Farmboxer, Jul 2, 2009
    #19
  5. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    I used to be able to name every champion (big four) in every division and their records and best wins, who they lost to etc..... Now I can't name one.... The titles are a piece of ****.... Just one of the many things that needs to change but won't due to greed.
     
    brown bomber, Jul 3, 2009
    brown bomber, Jul 3, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2