If Fury Never Fought Again?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, May 21, 2024.


  1. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    18,488
    19,430
    Jul 30, 2014
    I'd say Wilder's prime was 2019. He's certainly not in his prime now. Age, inactivity, and the damage he took from the Fury trilogy imo have taken that away.

    Fury himself didn't come out unscathed. That trilogy took a lot out of both men.
     
    naranja and Journeyman92 like this.
  2. KO_King

    KO_King Horizontal Heavyweight Full Member

    644
    1,354
    Apr 16, 2023
    Probably top 25 for me. He has some good wins and good qualities but, ultimately (particularly later on), is a fighter who actively chose soft touches instead of regularly testing himself against the best.
    He spent too much time fighting the Ngannou's, Schwartz's and Chisoras of this world. He could have been rated higher - and its his own fault he isnt.
     
    Finkel, Kid Bacon and slash like this.
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,453
    23,690
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yep and he beat wilder in 2020 and again in 2021. By the third fight wilder was like 36 I think and Mark Breland was no longer in his corner. Fury was decked twice in that match too.
     
    ikrasevic and swagdelfadeel like this.
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,453
    23,690
    Jan 3, 2007
    Even if Fury were to fight Usyk again and win, how much credit would we give him for splitting wins with what will probably be a 38 year old former cruiser who’s only fought once a year for the past half decade ? Twenty years ago the idea would have been considered by most as ludicrous. But our standards have dropped. It’s become normalized for guys to turn pro later. Fight longer and far less actively. Hell you have guys out there now who have been pro for 8-9 years, are well into their thirties and STILL 16-19 fight prospects
     
  5. iamthegreatest

    iamthegreatest Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,729
    1,546
    May 4, 2020
    Top 10-15, I'd say. Even though he hasn't had the greatest career wins and has fought questionable opposition, he's been in some great fights (particularly the Wilder trilogy) and you can't deny his talent. Just been abit too inactive and his career has lacked momentum at times to warrant a top 10 place.
     
    naranja likes this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,958
    Jun 2, 2006
    Not in my top ten. If he retired I would not miss him.I don't like the way he carries himself,I think he lacks any sort of class.Usyk winning made my week end!
     
    Kid Bacon, lordlosh, Fergy and 3 others like this.
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,094
    27,958
    Jun 2, 2006
    H2H I would rate Bowe above him.
     
  8. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Delusional BUT Determined Full Member

    16,791
    18,712
    Sep 22, 2021
    It forced both guys to properly fight for the first time in their career. Brought Fury out of his smoke and mirrors jiving for three good performances.
     
  9. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,841
    8,449
    Aug 15, 2018
    He’s too 30. But I suppose it’s how u rate people. I’m big into quality and variety of scalps. Some fighters like Fury spent a career avoiding guys. Y should I give him more credit than a guy like Holyfield who fought everyone even if it didn’t fit his style? There is no doubt he’s talented but he squandered it w steroid suspensions and retiring ten times. Only two good wins to his name. That doesn’t bode well for me.
     
  10. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    15,709
    25,727
    Aug 22, 2021
    Whether he wasted his talent or not, it’s more often the case that potentials are not realised as opposed to being fully advantaged.

    It’s a discredit to the much lesser number of fighters who do train and apply themselves 100% and who provide material proofs - so called “unrealised potential” remains very much in the realm of speculation.

    Also, if Fury had better proven himself against greater, quality competition - then there’s the added wear/tear/accrued damage factors that goes along with providing those material proofs. This is often left out of the “realised potential” equation.

    Some say the Wilder trilogy took it out of him - but should he have incurred such wear/tear/damage against the likes of Wilder in the first place?
     
  11. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,093
    34,225
    Jul 4, 2014
    Top 25. Which is still a phenomenal career. But no, he's not a major champion.
     
  12. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,606
    4,245
    Dec 5, 2010
    Fury defeated a p4p #2, unified champion in Vladimir Klitschko in Vlad's back yard. Regardless of how entertaining you found it, when an underdog nearly shuts out a p4p #2 fighter, you have to give credit.

    I'm not sure if you're serious arguing whether Wilder was prime when Fury fought him.
     
  13. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    4,968
    May 9, 2023
    30-50

    Anybody throwing him into top 10 discussions, even top 20 discussions is braindead. In no order think of these names:

    Ali, Louis, Marciano, Holmes, Foreman, Frazier, Lewis, Holyfield, Liston, Tyson, Dempsey, Walcott, Tunney, Wlad, Vitali, Usyk, Bowe, Jeffries, Charles, Patterson. That's 20 names. All of them have very sound claims to be rated ahead of Fury. Most of them are that far ahead of Fury that it's not even an argument.
     
  14. The Cryptkeeper

    The Cryptkeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,681
    4,968
    May 9, 2023
    Prime Fury vs geriatric Wlad.

    How many rounds to you think Fury lasts against a Dr Steelhammer who is 10 years youger?
     
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,411
    15,519
    Jul 19, 2004
    I tend to agree. I think he'd wind up being in the same ballpark as Bowe and Vitali.