If Golovkin unifies with Saunders on Sept. 15th

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by OvidsExile, May 14, 2018.


  1. Bensub

    Bensub Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,527
    1,051
    Jan 17, 2015
    False incorrect information.
     
  2. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,311
    24,028
    Jul 21, 2012
    lol@ at Golovkin fighting Saunders.. Thats a good one. :qmeparto:

    Weren't his fanboys complaining about cement footed Canelo moving around to much?? What do you think is going to happen when he faces the better moving and faster footed Saunders ? :confundio:

    Golovkin was over his undisputed dreams as soon as LaMule got taken to school. But everybody knows #allthebelts was just a ploy to avoid challengers like Ward :kiss:
     
    shadow111 likes this.
  3. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    I think he'll be forced to fight Sergei D first, which is a good fight. I'll stick to my guns: Him, Charlo or Saunders next and I'm a happy camper. I wouldn't be against a Jacobs rematch to be fair either.

    As for Canelo, I honestly think it's going to be Spike, assuming the rematch doesn't happen.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,846
    81,200
    Aug 21, 2012
    Derevyanchenko is a good fighter. He'd give a lot of guys problems.
     
  5. Tomato(e) Can

    Tomato(e) Can Emmanuel Dapidran Pacquiao. banned Full Member

    6,300
    5,643
    Feb 19, 2018
    Yes. BJS is no draw despite the importance of the match up. Plus, people want to see what a presumably clean Canelo looks like.
     
  6. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,846
    81,200
    Aug 21, 2012
    Sounds like you will be giving GGG a HUGE amount of credit should he beat Saunders.
     
  7. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,213
    27,924
    Jan 18, 2010
    I reply one more time to debunk your points, and after that I call it a day.
    Yes, because they have other big(ger) fights coming up, and not because they want to fight some pushover.
    They have a total of 3 mandatories, an optional complete unification or the Canelo fight instead. That's very much different than getting a (pre announced) deadline after getting exception after exception already, against the guy that should have the belt instead of you.
    You clearly said it was comparable in the post I reacted on. Which it totally isn't.
    He won the vacant belt against a low level journeyman, you can become a 4 weight champ pulling that s__t a couple of times.
    He never beat anyone, because he even struggles against domestic level opposition. All his defences were against total nobodies who shouldn't even be near a titlefight.
    He was the living enbodyment of a paper champion, and everyone knows that. He also isn't very good at all, and everyone knew that too.
    That doesn't change the fact that he was losing the fight against a domestic level (and best behind Canelo) oponnent, and needed a foul to eek out a win.
    Still, a close win over a domestic level opponent. The man clearly is about as world level as Paul is.
    Then it's about the thing surrounding it and now actually refusing the only valid testing that can detect it is very fishy
     
    chitownfightfan likes this.