If Groves v Froch is PPV....

they can chuck in the pac fight as part of the ppv package

i cant help thinkin that burns vs crolla is going to be on it

will they get barker out on this or give him his own card in london??

nothing worse for me than a load of olympians fighting nobodys on a card to fill it out

 

Macklin vs Lee at least hopefully as a sort of eliminator for Barker.

 

bit soon for lee hes meant to be fighting on fury haye card??

 

Yeah Lee is on the Haye Fury bill

 

Guarentee the undercard will be **** like it was for Froch v Kessler and like it seems to be for Haye vs Fury, honestly i think the best chance of a good card is Barker vs Murray or Macklin, what about Brian Rose in some sort of eliminator as another fight

 

at least haye/fury has a decent chief support.

 

the froch v kessler undercard wernt tht bad imo

 

Barker is fighting Sturm in November/December time.

 

is Sturm coming here

 

How this sells and whether it can viably be a PPV will a lot depend on as many said the undercard, but I think how Haye Fury does.
Froch is well enough known for it to PPV, and Groves/Booth can get his face and name a lot out on the back of Haye/Fury if it sells well and is a good fight.
If it's yet another 3 round stinker ala Harrison then no chance a PPV is going to go well - sad for Groves, as he and Froch (especially) are not Haye/Fury, but it's just how the armchair casuals/football fans are.
Groves will be a name due to Degale mostly, but hasn't really fought enough names that casuals will have heard of.
Back to the undercard though, if Barker is fighting Sturm on it too then definitely PPV. Both lads are Chelsea fans too, if I'm right?