If Hagler and Hearns fought that same fight 10 times

Good question. Depends whether Hearns obliges Hagler and fights his fight again. If it's a violent slugfest, he loses every time, imo (but not quite as quickly)

 

Hearns would never beat Hagler.

The OP question is strange, because you'd imagine in that case, the fights would be 100% identical, but there's probably some chaos theory stuff that would produce variations, so I don't know.

Anyway, yeah, Hagler the winner.

 

Hearns had staggered up Hagler with that punch that he broke his hand with. This is only speculation, but if Tommy hadn't busted his fist like a gra pe on Marvin's marvellous mandible, he may even have had a chance of ... dare I say it ... stopping Hagler. Hearns truly did have pulverising power at his disposal. He was also a slickster when the situation demanded it. It's not inconceivable that he could have outboxed Hagler if he managed to get out of the torrid opening rounds and into deeper waters.

Having said all that, however, the fact remains that this was one of the times when Hagler knew what he had to do, had the right gameplan against Hearns, and executed it perfectly. Out of a ten fight series I reckon Hagler would win at least seven.

 

Yes, I agree.
It would, I believe, be Hagler winning by KO or TKO every time though, so that's same enough for me.

 

With a rattlesnake slithering across the ring floor, it's only a matter of time.

 

:good

 

Marvin wins all the time. The way I see it, Tommy tried to box Marv a few times in the fight, but he just couldn't keep the Marvelous one off of him.

 

Hagler 10/10

See Iran Barkley's 2/2 head to head against Hearns

No matter how Hearns fought Hagler he would have lost.

If he'd moved and boxed he would have lasted much longer, but Hagler would have caught up with him.

At 160, Hearn's didn't have enough strength and power to bother Hagler.

And, he didn't have the legs to move and box for twelve straight rounds.