If Hagler moved up to face a Lt. Heavy Hearns..who wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Jan 30, 2016.


  1. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    More competitive than middle I think.:happy
     
  2. Gatekeeper

    Gatekeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,367
    2,987
    Oct 18, 2009
    Would last longer than 3 rounds yeah. More competitive too.

    A few extra pounds though won't cure Tommy's chin and stamina issues and MH will still be able take TH's punches, walk him down constantly and get a stoppage.
     
  3. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,469
    9,482
    Oct 22, 2015
    Same result, just a later round.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,234
    21,724
    Sep 15, 2009
    Hagler was too big for Hearns at MW.

    Let hem both put on a stone of muscle and Hagler is still too big for Hearns.
     
  5. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    Hearns has bigger frame, i doubt that 147-154 pounds was his natural weight because he was skin and bone, at that weight he was drained but he could carry more weight than hagler being effective. At lhw hearns wins vs a beach ball hagler. Actually i think that 168-175 was the natural weight of hearns, simply he had to cut weight to be especial with his size advantage in lower weight classes.just like ricky hatton was actually a natural stocky 175 pounder( himself said it), his frame was very robust, simply he was too short
     
  6. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    I think Hagler would always have Hearns' number...