If Hatton really want Mayweather........

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, May 28, 2008.


  1. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Probably the other way round i.e. Hatton is ducking Cotto. We keep hearing Ray and Ricky blowing Maligfaggots trumpet as if he is the second coming of Christ. Never ever heard them mention Cotto, I guess it makes sense to only mention the name sof shitty fighters you can beat easily like maligfaggot. If they mentioned Cotto and he agreed then the Hattons would be up **** creek. A loss against Cotto would knock the PBF rematch on the head (and more importantly to the mega money he would get form that fight). I suppose Hatton can continue fighting **** till a big money fight comes along. If not PBF then ODH.
     
  2. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Yep, "probably the other way around" ie. you don't know but it doesn't matter because its Hatton.

    Hattons at 140 and Cotto is at 147, and yet Hatton is ducking Cotto iat 140? They are simply fighting in different weight divisions theres no ducking going on and no great mystery.

    I havn't much at all from the Hattons about PM, certainly not bragging up his boxing ability too much??? Or is that another "probably"?
     
  3. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Why you get so defensive when it comes to Hatton ? Are you really Matt Hatton ?

    How many years has Ricky and Ray been shitting about being best at 140 ? Was Cotto at 140 then ? I think so and whilst they bragged about being best they constantly ignored Cotto. Maybe you buy into the Ray and Ricky b/s but some of us can see through the PR b/s for what the real story is.

    If they are fighting in different weight divisions then Hatton should shut the fck up about fighting PBF again. It is more than certain the PBF not coming down to 140.
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    I'm no relation but the way every situation seems to be Hattons fault with some people is ridiculous. Even as in this case theres no evidence either way it still Hattons fault...err....probably.

    I remember when both Hatton and Cotto were at 140 and Cotto (or his people) wern't keen on a Hatton fight either. They both wanted to keep their guys winning and earning, but you like to believe it was only Hatton because it suits your view of him.

    Hatton should fight at whichever weight suits him best and if he feels its worth the risk/ reward moving up to 147 to take on one fighter but not another then thats his perogative as well.
     
  5. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Is that something you believe because it suits your point of view ?
     
  6. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    I think the lack of hards facts that one side ducked the other and the fact that niether side really publicly pushed for the fight at 140 makes that a reasonable outlook to have on the situation?

    Certainly better than using the lack of any evidence or proof to just pick one of the boxers to blame because you don't like him....
     
  7. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    More than enough proof that Hatton is a ducker. He has been fighting road sweepers for years and the only time he stepped it up (for money) he got whooped by PBF.

    Now we have him and his dad once again talking up this maligfaggot puff. Why not Torres or anyone else at 140 ? I tell you why Hatton always fights low level fighters and they can see that Cotto destoyed Maligfaggot and now they want a piece of him.
     
  8. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    :lol:

    Thats it, change the subject and provide nothing new to your argument re Cotto but childish insults. Learn how to debate a subject and not just repeatedly throw out the same unproven, personal rants.

    Pauli is recognized as the number 2 in the world at 140, but I guess no matter who Hatton fights it'll always be the wrong fighter from your point of view.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    By who? He got a gift against Ngoudjo, so Herman should be above him for 1. Bradley has a better win than any of Malignaggis and WItter has still done way more than Malignaggi, even if he lost. Hell you could even have Kotelnik/Torres above Paulie

    Not a bad fight this 1, but nothing to shout about either
     
  10. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    I think you need to learn how to debate instead of propagating propaganda and claiming it to be the truth based on your farcical logic.

    Yes maligfaggot is heads and shoulders above the likes of Torres :lol: Whatever next ? Kendall Holt is number 3 ? :nut
     
  11. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Kotelnik would **** Hattons ass all night. Ray and Ricky cant have that as then the mega money fight against PBF is down the toilet.
     
  12. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007
    Do you really think Kotelnik would beat (****) Hatton:huh

    It would be a good fight and i like Kotelnik, but i thnik he is pretty one paced and it took everything he had to finally get rid of Rees.
     
  13. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Lacanzo was catching Hatton easy, Kotelnik is 200% better and has more boxing nouse that Lazcano. Maybe not **** him but would be more interesting than watching him fight malignaggi.
     
  14. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    I'm sorry, but this is a classic example of hating on anything Hatton does.

    Hatton fights the number 2 at the weight and you say he should fight somebody else.....despite you being one of the ones saying he had to fight Witter, because he was the number 2 at the weight before Bradley. :patsch

    If Hatton beat Torres, you'd quite rightly say 'Who has Torres ever beat aside from a gift stoppage against Holt?'
     
  15. kurt2006

    kurt2006 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,942
    2
    Mar 5, 2006
    Who said maligfaggot is no.2 ? Ricky and his dad ?

    Besides if that was the case why not fight Witter (before the loss he was rated higher than maligfaggot). Also the maligfaggot fight was made a long time before witter lost so please do not try and pull the wool over peoples eyes that it was made because he is no.2. The Hattons were intent on fighting maligfaggot come what may in the rankings.

    Go check my past posts and you will know what I was advocating. Do a search for Zab Judah in the brit forum and see how many times I mentioned him with regards to whopping Hattons ******* :hey .