If he wins against the best pfp fighter in the world (who is pfp the best by a distance) then I say yes it does put him top. To even put calzaghe in the mix then is simply ridiculous! He probably deserves to be above calzaghe at the moment, let alone after beating Floyd. IMO
Well, what if Cotto, too, for example, would beat Mayweather? What if in addition, he would beat Ricky too...according to some here, Ricky, if he beats PBF, is No.1, because PBF is No.1...but if what I have assumed is true, and Hatton wins, shouldn't he come below Cotto and above PBF, the latter coming below him?
Nope... Pac will take it. He's the real #1 P4P. PBF & Hatton ducks the best opponents. You can't say the same to Pac. Hatton lost to Collazo, PBF lost to Castillo. enough said.
well hattons not ducking mayweather and vice versa. hatton didn't lose, he got a UD. although i agree mayweather lost the first fight with castillo, and anyway you shouldn't be trying to argue your point for pac if looking at losses on records, hatton and mayweather have zero, pac has 3
Incredible. He is fighting the p4p #1 outside of his natural weight division and still someone has to make this ridiculous claim.