by beating both klitchsko's haye would effectively have cleared out the heavyweight division - does he really need to beat anyone else in the heavyweight division bar vlad, vitali, and valuev? saying that, if he beat both klits as well as clearing out the cruiserweight division, this forum would still be jam packed full of ring comic puppetts who have chad dawson and andre ward higher in their p4p rankings than haye.
why is any body would think he can bit even one of them.ive seen all fights at heavy,and i even not convinced he can bit ibragimov,or chagaev.how about areola.my end of story he hill be strached by wlad and it will be start of retirement for hey.and he will be rememmbered as greatest loud mouth after M.A.:deal
And if he gets knocked out in the 1st round by the 1st flush punch Wlad lands? Where would you rank him then?
not he is not. marciano ,quarry,dempsey,floyd patterson,tunney(when he faced dempsey) or even the best joe louis(weighed 198 pounds) were cruiser really but at this time this weight class did not exist ,qawi,bert cooper.. all them would beat haye at cruiser.
If Haye did manage to beat them both, much less, one, he'd be on anyone's ATG list, I would think. It'd be an incredible feat that ANYone would have to acknowledge as such.
Are the Klitschkos ATGs? If Haye beats them both, does it mean that they are very overrated, or is Haye that good? Going by what I see here, the Klits are rated as ATGs already, so if Haye beats them, he should then be an ATG also.
It really is hard to understand greatness for an obscure shithead like yourself and Mrs. Daley. Haye, the top 10 ATG British warriour. FACT. :happy
Then what about Jimmy Young? He beat George Foreman, should he also be considered an ATG? See folks this logic "You beat a good man you're a great" IMO doesn't really work unless you apply a series of other factors.
I think that would be the fairest outcome seeing as allot of people rank the Klitschko bros in the ATG top 20 :good