If Haye get's KO'd......

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ninebar, Dec 15, 2008.


  1. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    All the talk here on ESB and probably around the Boxing world is Vitali will destroy David Haye.
    If this happens and Haye look's bad will he still get his fight with Wlad?
     
  2. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,871
    9,292
    Apr 25, 2008
    If Haye loses he will probably have to start over again. Beat some top contender's before he gets another shot at any title.
     
  3. Yeah, he'll still get Wlad.
     
  4. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,007
    1,865
    Oct 13, 2008
    Yes, and this is why Haye isn't worried about being beaten in this fight.

    Haye wants to make money with both Klitschkos, and he knows Vitali is likely to retire soon, so he's jumping to the head of the line with the elder of the two fighting brothers. I think it's a brilliant move, business-wise.

    Haye's already lost, so there is no "'O' Mystique" issue for him. His angle is to get attention and make fights people want to see. In that vein, he's taking the fight with Vitali (as long as Vitali has everything worked out with the WBC, or whatever). It doesn't matter if Haye gets KO'd as long as he makes a good promotion and fight. He's smart, and he realizes this and is ahead of the game compared to other fighters who are trying to carefully matchmake so as to never be beaten.

    Haye's in the game to make $$$, have fun and get famous. He knows how to do all three of these things, and I think he believes that it doesn't matter if he gets beaten by Vitali Klitschko because he knows he can easily stir the pot and get more big fights later.

    I agree with him, and as much as he annoys me, I like him and admire his business savvy as far as his career goes.
     
  5. rickx1

    rickx1 Legend Full Member

    3,183
    0
    Sep 16, 2008
    He won't lose.
     
  6. kgs83

    kgs83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,868
    0
    Jan 14, 2008

    You also missed the point that he is a very good boxer.
     
  7. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I disagree, They'll claim Haye isn't worthy of a Wladimir fight because Vitali beat him, ect. That's the whole point of Vitali cockblocking in the first place.
     
  8. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    Haye is unproven as heavyweight. He should fight someone like Arreola for a start and let The Champions do their business.
     
  9. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Course he should. And JMM should have fought Amir Khan before being allowed to take on Casamayor, Kelly Pavlik should have had to take on Tavoris Cloud before fighting Bernard Hopkins and, if Manny Pacquiao wants Hatton he needs to go through Lamont Peterson first...
     
  10. Ivo

    Ivo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,351
    81
    Jul 20, 2004
    How about Thompson, Peter, McCall, Ruiz, Brewster?

    And Holyfield fought Tyson is 1988, right?
     
  11. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    Now this is a smart post. :good
    You get it. It's more than just what happens in the ring.