If Haye was to retire tonight.....

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Dan684, May 21, 2010.


  1. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Who would have down as having the better career ?

    Joe Calzaghe vs David Haye ?

    Would David's two wins at Heavy (Valuev + Ruiz) be better than Joe's at Light Heavy (Jones + Hopkins)

    Does Joes succesful defences against Kessler and Lacy trump Hayes against Mormic and Maccarenelli ?

    Do you consider the fact that Haye won both his first world titles in each respective divison in his opponents backyard better than the fact Joe remained undefeated (Ableit against poor Opposition sometimes) for such a long time ?

    Does Haye's defeat against Thompson let him down here or does Joe's lack of travelling and dangerous opposition let him down ?

    I feel if Haye beats Wlad he surpasses Calzaghe's legacy with ease but what about now ????
     
  2. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Calzaghe - I mean come on!
     
  3. cheekyvid

    cheekyvid Detroit, I shall return. Full Member

    7,324
    3
    Nov 4, 2009
  4. gurmon

    gurmon Active Member Full Member

    612
    91
    Jul 18, 2009
    At this point in time, its Calzaghe legacy which shines above Hayes
     
  5. theuppercut

    theuppercut Blackpudding supper Full Member

    6,084
    0
    Apr 21, 2009
    Haye would fall short mate if he stopped tonight.

    I see where you're coming from but Haye is still a bit behind. For me he'd have to beat both Klits and Adamek or someone like that to possibly match him.
     
  6. Maza1987

    Maza1987 Illin' since '87 Full Member

    1,348
    0
    Mar 17, 2007
    Joe's.

    Haye cannot retire without fighting a klit.
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    Mormeck was a bit past it, the great thing about that victory was doing it away from home and coming off the deck and showing smartness. Rather than Mormeck being great. And thats his best win. Maccarinelli is a bit worthless, that wins even more devalued than Lacy which I thought impossible.

    Ruiz and Valuev are okay but neither are better than Hopkins.
     
  8. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    I can see why people would say Calzaghe but for me if he beat ONE Klit i'd have him a fair distance above Joe :good

    Mormec (In France) and Enzo aren't that far behind Kessler and Lacy in terms of how good a win they were. Kessler win was avery good one I'll admit

    Valuev (In Germany) and Ruiz are probably on par with Hopkins and Jones (Both in the states) too.

    Calzaghe has more 'average' wins no doubt but beating Wlad would eclipse anything Joe did IMO by a HUGE margin.

    By the way I think Haye's getting beat by Wlad anyway :good
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Calzaghe, but not by much.

    If Haye packed it in now he'd be remembered much the same as Calzaghe really, a guy who wasted his prime - but instead of fighting bums he'd been running his mouth.
     
  10. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Woodhall - Enzo
    Hopkins > Mormeck
    Kessler > Valuev
    Lacy > Ruiz
    Reid > Frag
    Veit - Gurov
    Mitchell > Bonin
    Manfredo > Abdoul
    Bika > Rossitto
    Eubank > Kelly

    etc. etc.

    Calzaghe CLEARLY right now.
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    Yep, you could match the names any reasonable way and it will always come out Calzaghe.

    Add a Klit to the mix and it gets more interesting.
     
  12. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Hmmmm....

    See for me best wins are Kessler-Valuev. Is the Kessler win in Wales that much better than beating a World Champ in his home town being HEAVILY outweighed and having a lesser reach etc etc

    Kessler is better than Valuev no doubt but Haye had everything stacked against him barring speed
     
  13. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    Good way of settling the argument.

    Quite clearly Calzaghe at the moment. Take into account that the majority on here (Brit and General forum) had Calzaghe as borderline top 100 all-time when he retired, then Haye still has a way to go. A Klit or two on the record will certainly shake things up though.
     
  14. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    You can look at it in different ways I guess. Valuev was old, beaten before, had dubious decisions against Holyfield, Ruiz etc. Kessler was in his prime, unbeaten, only 2nd to Calzaghe in the division. Haye won a close, but clear, decision. Calzaghe after a even 4-5 rounds took over and dominated to win a convincing decision.

    I just personally feel that Kessler was a better win than Valuev :good
     
  15. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Fair enough pal. I just think sometimes that Haye's win is underated