If hbo did a new season of legendary nights what fights would you choose

cotto-margo: controversy, an upset, speculation, margo being the most feared man in boxing and having a chance of getting some exposure of the limelight that cotto had an abundance of. cotto trying to become a real p4p fighter the back and fourth fight and the pressure, then just a great figth in general.

 

Cotto vs. Margarito

 

Tarver-Jones
Pac-Marquez 1
Gatti-Ward
Margarito-Cotto
Castillo-Mayweather
Gatti-Robinson

 

Tarver-Jones
Pac-Marquez 1
Gatti-Ward
Margarito-Cotto
Castillo-Mayweather
Gatti-Robinson

 

that's a weak ass ****en list....

 

Cotto/Margarito is the worst option because it has never been proven and HBO aren't going to make a legendary night episode pointing fingers.

Really no fight of the last 10 years is worthy of an episode.

Pac/Marquez were just a trio of fights with a bad decision , maybe two. Boring

Mayweather/Ortiz. Just a k.o punch on the break. Not enought interesting/controversial content of half hour. Plus its fresh in everybodys mind.

Pacquiao/Bradley Too soon . A bad decision . Nothing more.

Gatti/Ward and Lewis/Klitschko is the only viable option. Before that Louis/Schmeling

 

HBO is to biased in just about everything they do related to boxing, I just would'nt enjoy any of the crap they cover or chose to rehash!

Even their Legendary Nights are full of biased crap.

What would be better is to have somebody else not paid by HBO produce and direct a legendary nights type of rehash of a fight, and recound the happenings of the fights without the bias inputs of the HBO commentators.
The Pac-Marquez controversial trilogy would make for great viewing.
With interviews from both sides of the boxing media spectrum for and against the fighters.
An HBO produced show would barely break a mention to the controversy of the fights and would never mention that the mass media favored Marquez in at least 2 of the 3 fights.

The same with the Morales-MAB trilogy. To air a legendary night recounting the story and airing interviews then and now of people involved with the fighters would be great viewing if the teeth marks of the bias HBO team did'nt show in the production.

HBO sucks is what I'm saying, they can stop with their legendary crap episodes. Its all smoke and mirrors to paint the picture they would want the audience to see, and its very often not the true accounts of the happenings, so screw them!

 

Ok

 

**** Choices.

 

Very recent memory that HBO would have...
Mayweather vs. Cotto
Pacquiao vs. Marquez III
Kirkland vs. Angulo
Sergio vs. Williams II

 

*******.:verysad

 

Go watch the series before you comment, dumb ****.

 

Wladimir Klitschko vs Sultan Ibragimov

 

pac vs jmm
cotto vs margs
p will vs sergio
kirkland vs angulo
morales vs barrera
gatti vs ward
tito vs vargas
garcia vs khan

 

I don't care about more recent fights. I don't need to relive a fight from a few years ago.

I'd rather them do older fights, but without the stupid myths and exaggerations that hurt the first series and pollute boxing forums.