Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Apr 7, 2021.
It would have been a lot more dangerous than any successful title defense Mike ever made.
I feel Cus`s ideas were brilliant.
Well. He was gay. And we know your struggles in that area.
Are you the black fellow in your avatar sitting with Ray Mancini leaning over your shoulder?
lol! @Morlocks called me Mancini once in the disant past.
Holyfield is still a 1st ballot HOFer.
Tyson and Lewis would’ve probably fought sooner. Maybe even as early as 1996-97.
He wouldn’t have as many good wins but he’d have a much cleaner record without so many losses and would likely be healthier these days .
Holyfield did the same in their first fight Lewis is a lot stronger than Holyfield.
This is mid to late 90's Tyson not the Tyson of the 80's.
One thing of note- Tyson may not have met Lewis till just as late. No Holyfield and Tyson drops an L to someone less skilled and most likely splits a trilogy. Tyson followed Money he was not in it for the legacy at all by then. Lennox was simply not a good enough draw worth the risk in the same manner as the early stages of Floyd Mayweathers career.