If I had a dime for all the times...

The question is brought up in every sport. Does a commentator/fan/expert have to have experience in the sport in order for them to praise/criticize/critique?

 

not to me. i like fighters commenting on the technical aspects and giving me the fighters perspective. critics and commentators, i would rather have catering to my perspective.

i agree with your initial post, though.

 

U jerked of to men....ud be a billionaire !!!

 

Looking forward to Moreno's fight tonight, smoov?

 

..somebody posted a pointless *******/***** thread.

 

Moreno has long been underrated but since his Mares defeat (which I could ***** about a lot as a fan; from low blows all day to horrible point deduction to one of the worst single scorecards I've seen), he really has been too inactive given his limited challengers. Look forward to seeing him continue his reign at bantamweight.

By the way, I'm 90% sure that fight is tonight, not tomorrow night.

 

Broner is a ***** and he's stepped foot in the ring, yet, I respect the opinion of MVC! more than that **** Broner. :yep

 

To be fair, i bet a lot of professional boxers bum either of those two, trying to emulate their styles both in the ring and out of. Mayweather and Pacquiao are hero's to some fans, icons if you will; But due to absurd bias from watchers on, it makes you dislike their fans and in turn changing your perspective on a fighter. Seeing him differently then you first did. If they had any inclination on what these two fella's take on day in day out, fight in fight out then they would have more respect than to diss a fighter due to his string of opponents or weight problems while they sit in their chair judging and criticizing eating a doughnut. These boxers have done more exercise in a day then many of their diehard trolls have done in a year. But thanks to the internet; everyone has a voice