If it happened, I think Mikey vs Lomachenko deserves to be a PPV.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by shadow111, Jul 31, 2017.


  1. shadow111

    shadow111 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,180
    9,893
    Aug 1, 2012
    You know Mikey vs AB was just regular Showtime, not a PPV. But if Mikey fought Lomachenko don't you think it's good enough to headline a PPV?

    Wouldn't that be a big incentive to make this fight happen? I mean rarely do we see a PPV with the main event below welterweight, but if Mikey were to fight Lomachenko personally I'd gladly buy that PPV. I mean this is a dream matchup. This to me is PPV worthy, especially after Mikey just disposed of AB putting on a clinic.

    Lomachenko is fighting on Free TV, ESPN in his next fight vs a guy that lost his last fight. If Lomachenko is victorious, don't you think it is a perfect time for this fight to be made? Mikey is still a champ at 135. I mean he just fought at 140, if it's not made this year, then Mikey is going to fight at 140 and 147 and you know the weight disparity will grow. So I'm asking you do you think Mikey vs Lomachenko is PPV worthy?

    I mean we can't look past Marriaga, but if Lomachenko is victorious this weekend, don't you think now is the right time to make this fight? Would you pay to see Mikey vs Lomachenko? As much as Bob Arum has his big ESPN deal, wouldn't he love to make this fight and make a big HBO PPV fight later this year?

    You add in the fact that Showtime treated Mikey and Robert Garcia so terribly during fight week, wouldn't this make sense to happen as an HBO PPV later this year?
     
  2. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
  3. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,295
    38,080
    Aug 28, 2012
    What have their ratings been like? If they are both routinely over one million viewers for their fights, then that is reasonable. If they are less than a million viewers then it is not economically practical. That is why Gonzalez isn't on pay per view with all of his fights. He is p4p the best in the sport but he's too small to draw and only makes 200 grand a fight. I think Lomachenko and Garcia both make about a million dollars a fight already no matter who they fight. It's not p4p that determines what someone gets paid it's dollars per viewer.
     
  4. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,295
    38,080
    Aug 28, 2012
    There's a card coming up on September 9th "Superfly" with Inoue, Gonzalez, Estrada, Cuadras, and Viloria on it. That is on regular HBO. If that's not pay per view, no way is Lomachenko vs Garcia pay per view.
     
  5. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,046
    18,332
    Jul 29, 2004
    Id have to pay for it anyway..and I would.
     
  6. khaosai galaxi

    khaosai galaxi Superbad Full Member

    2,979
    2,510
    Apr 17, 2017
    I think it is ppv worthy. And if both want purses above 3M each it might need to be.
    Both are not ppv proven material though, so I doubt it can sell 150k.
     
    S.K and pincai like this.
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    Anyone know how many viewers theyve been getting?
     
  8. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,648
    241,343
    Nov 23, 2013
    Nothing is PPV worthy from here on out, its been dying a slow and painful death, it needs to be cast into the dustbin of history and done away with already, its a relic of the past.
     
    thesmokingm and qwertyblahblah like this.
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I would like to see that fight, but it's not worth PPV. It's time fans rebel against the PPV robberies..................$100 for Void/Coner is absurd, PPV is all absurd.....................
     
  10. BoxingABC1

    BoxingABC1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,567
    4,782
    Sep 21, 2016
    as much as i'd love to see the fight, i really want to see Loma unify the division first
     
  11. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    The Ward-Kovalev buys should be a wakeup call to promoters that ppv has been killing boxing. Loma-Mikey should definitely be on ESPN, or Showtime if it's a Haymon fight, it has no business even being considered for ppv. Arum has been attacking 'premium cable' more than ppv though, so my worry is while he'll try to consistently put top level boxing on ESPN he'll try to sell us what he calls a superfight on ppv every few months, even if the fight can't actually pull enough viewers that it should warrant it.

    I disagree with your one million viewers as a baseline for a possible ppv fighter. The core audience for HBO boxing the last 10 years is one million+. Every fighter with an established reputation gets ratings of 1 million. Mikey Garcia did against Juanma and probably all his HBO fights, Lomachenko had reached that number in his last fight. Kovalev, Ward, Crawford all comfortably get 1 million ratings, GGG even more, and those are guys who have bombed when they've been on ppv. It's more like generating TWO million on HBO suggests the guy financially warrants ppv. Meaning Canelo, as he pulled 2.2 million on HBO against Kirkland. Showtime doesn't quite get the viewers HBO does, but they've been catching up. Broner-Maidana got over a million, I wonder what Broner-Mikey did.

    I'm going by the numbers here, most of which you provided.
    https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...pdated-thurman-vs-collazo-1-1-million.510793/

    You can really see how HBO boxing is dying. The one million core audience for boxing on HBO now was closer to 3 million from the 1990s through to around 2005. Gatti-Ward got over 4 million, Trinidad-Whitaker and Lewis-Klitschko over 7 million, etc. Maybe Arum's right that relegating boxing to premium cable is just as bad as ppv. It should be obvious that keeping the best fights on commercial TV is best for anything but the shortest term, but I'm sure a lot of boxing fans could accept and more regularly buy ppv if they could cancel their HBO (and Showtime) subscriptions, and if they weren't more than $40.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2017
    pincai and OvidsExile like this.
  12. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    No way. Being on a PPV isn't a reward for taking a tough fight. 90% of what's on PPV now would be on regular HBO or SHO. Neither guy is a seller, and that's what determines whether you belong on PPV or not.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  13. Radrook

    Radrook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,923
    917
    Feb 24, 2017
    There are still people out there who will fall for all the hype and give their money to see these hyped up events.
    Weird!
     
  14. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    WTF, you want to pay for the fight out of your own pocket? Why not let the powers that be get paid for putting on a good fight/show by advertisers? That's how tv works. Put on a good show, you get paid a lot via the numbers. With PPV, they don't have to do **** towards putting out a good fight or card. They've already been paid and they make another round thru advertisers.
     
  15. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    Just because people watch fights don't mean that they are willing to pay to watch. The buzz surrounding a potential fight will dictate whether people are willing to pay to see it. In other words, the people will let you know if it's PPV or not. Not HBO, Showtime or anybody else should dictate that we pay for a fight just because they want to line their pockets. PPV's should truly be special fights and fights like that don't come along that often.