If it was say Floyd or Oscar or any big money, big payday fighters for example, not Hopkins(theoretically etc), in the ring and the match panned out exactly the way as it did; would Joe have still been given the decision?
no!!they can make alot more money with joe whilst hopkins is at the end of the road{ but honestly hopkins didn't throw enough leather on a constant basis }and i'm a die hard hopkins fan but hopkins lost!!! but mayweather is more marketable than joe
I think a lot more people would be complaining about the decision, if it was Floyd. But, if Oscar managed a split decision, i think Calzaghe would have gotten the nod.
I think Joe won but Bernard was going to retire and has never been able to generate revenue. Personally I think a big money boxer sways the decision easy.