If Jack wins he has one of the best resume active

Jack seems average at best and he kinda just lucked into the belt. I just don't see anything special about him other than he's a black Swedish guy

 

A rare case of granite chin getting KO'd?

 

I agree, we both look at it for a different angle and that's fine, if we all thought the same this site would be seriously boring.

If you have done a lot of research on the subject of PED's in boxing/sport then fair play to you, I haven't done that much, I believe I know enough to get by in conversation but I'm not an expert.

But I always say if anybody on here educates me of certain subjects I am more than willing to read and learn, I do get things wrong and I do know I don't know everything, I just state my opinions, we all do and different opinions are a good thing.

 

and then luckily defended it twice?

 

Not that this pertains to jack because his level of opposition has been solid. But Wilder has defended his belt twice and I feel he's extremely lucky that his teams matchmaking abilities are off the charts

 

Povetkin is just the worst cheater known to man lol

 

You can't think of any? That's not a good sign.

Roman Gonzalez- Cuadras, Arroyo, Viloria, Sosa
Orlando Salido- Vargas, Martinez, Martinez, Terdsak, Lomachenko, Cruz, Mikey
Manny Pacquiao- Vargas, Bradley, Mayweather, Algieri, Bradley
...I know you would stress the "back to back" part to complain about the tons more I could list off, citing one softer touch as ruining the "string of opponents back to back" so I'll just leave it at this. But your thread title says if he wins, "he has one of the best resumes active." I said that no, no he would not. And I could list a whole slew of guys with better and longer resumes.

That said, yes, would be a nice little run for Jack. It already has been.

 

Well I knew you wouldn't like some others because you'd point at one soft touch among their last handful of opponents. As for actual whole careers, there are tons with better resumes than Jack would have, even if he beats DeGale. That said, it would be an impressive stretch of four straight quality name opponents for a guy that has ten times as many haters as fans and who folks routinely warned with "expect that belt to be held hostage for ages" and "no way Jack successfully defends against any fringe contender." I was wrong because I wouldn't have thought he was this good, but I didn't think he was as bad as most on this forum seemed to think just a short couple years ago.