If JMM beats Casamayor while Calzaghe beats up a faded legend, should JMM jump to #2?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Aug 26, 2008.


  1. shadow boxer

    shadow boxer Member Full Member

    322
    0
    Aug 26, 2008
    JMM beating Casa would be a much bigger achievement than Joe beating Roy. However, a lot depends on the manner of victory though. Bit of a lose lose situation for Joe as either way this fight does his legacy no good. Think that there is a real potential for an upset. It's a long shot but not too far-fetched. Hopefully we'll see two big fights in JMM v Pac 3 and Joe v Pavlik in 2009. Both fights would be between legitimate p4ps and would be massive events.
     
  2. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Bit of a lose lose situation for Joe as either way this fight does his legacy no good - his own fault. He shouldn't have taken the fight.

    Think that there is a real potential for an upset - There isn't.

    Hopefully we'll see two big fights in JMM v Pac 3 and Joe v Pavlik in 2009. Both fights would be between legitimate p4ps and would be massive events - Abso****inglutely.
     
  3. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    It would depend on how each of them won their fights, regardless of who's opponent is faded..
     
  4. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Casamayor is a faded legend as well.

    I don't give either Roy nor Casa more than a puncher's chance of winning their respective fights, so I don't see why a win over either one should affect their respective rankings.
     
  5. shadow boxer

    shadow boxer Member Full Member

    322
    0
    Aug 26, 2008


    Completely agree that it was Joe's own fault. Plenty of fights out there for him to cement his reputation.

    Maybe it was my heart and not my head talking when i said there was real potential for an upset. Do think that if a properly conditioned and motivated roy turns up it could be interesting for 7 or 8 rounds at least. At least roy won't have to worry about Joe knocking him out. Only chance of a Joe stoppage is if he swarms Roy with punches and make it look like he's in more trouble than he is
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    That is the way Calzaghe stops most opponents. 30 TKOs and only 2 KOs from 32 stoppages tells a story. The most blatant example I can think of was the Manfredo stoppage- it was a fair stoppage as Manfredo wasn't hitting back, but he wasn't hurt at all, it was just speed and volume that forced the referee's hand. I think the same will happen in this fight, I don't think Roy has the resistance to fight off a sustained attack anymore.
     
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,896
    11,876
    Jan 6, 2007
    I believe I've mentioned this before, but some of what you term 'fan-boyism' is tongue-in-cheek reaction to the scads and scads of anti-Calzaghe drivel that was evident on this board since just before the Lacy fight. (And not just directed at Calzaghe, but at all Euro fighters).

    Undoubtedly, there are Calzaghe 'fanboys', but they are a small group in comparison to those who've posted anti-Calzaghe nonesense at every opportunity.

    A longer stretch on the board would have made this evident.
     
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I don't think so. I have been on the board far longer than Caldragon, and the threads I have seen which ran longest and loudest were ones saying Calzaghe was the greatest fighter in history or some other non-sensical piece of ****. Those ones usually run to around 20-50 pages, I doubt the fanboys was keep it going quite as long if they didn't believe it. And if they were just being hilarious hoaxers with their zany tongue-in-cheek antics, then they must be even more moronic than I first thought, as the amount of time and effort they put into advocating something they don't even actually think truly is pitiful.
     
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,896
    11,876
    Jan 6, 2007

    How a fighter is stopped is hardly a relevant measure of the dominance of the winner.

    Lacy wasn't stopped at all, but was dominated to a far greater degree than say Hearns was in his first fight with Leonard (Leonard won stoppage in round 13) or Oscar was in his 9th round loss to Bernard.

    And a quick perusal of BoxRec is no substitute for having actually seen the fights. You cite 30 stoppages and compare them to the Manfredo stoppage (BTW, was it Joe's fault the guy stopped fighting?) when most of his early career stoppages bore no resemblence to that bout.

    One of the most brutal stoppages of recent years was Tarver-Jones (2), and that was a TKO.

    And when Kostya made Zab do the chicken dance, that was a TKO.

    More recently, does it diminish Margarito's stoppage over Cotto that it was a TKO.

    Your post speaks volumes on the bias I mentioned in an earlier post.
     
  10. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    The answer is no. I guess we're all forgetting that Cas should've never gotten the nod over Santa Cruz and was clearly losing against Katsidis before Katsidis literarlly ran into that left hook. Beating Casa is not much better than Calzaghe beating Roy. In fact the Roy win might even be better. You also have to consider that Marquez lost his last fight and Calzaghe beat Hopkins in his last fight. Sorry, in no way can JMM jump to no.2 on the strenght of beating Casa.
     
  11. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I couldn't disagree more. First off, Marquez lost to Pac despite how you might have scored the fight. Only a scoring error prevented him from having two losses against Pac. Second, Casa was on his way to losing to a punching bag himself before Katsidis lost his mind. Casa is cleary on the slide. His only saving grace is that tainted ring belt that he has.
     
  12. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,896
    11,876
    Jan 6, 2007
    All the haters make that same excuse.

    Divac claims to get riled by Pac's fanboys and Jack Presscott denies any hate for Oscar and has coined the term 'Oscarsexual' to describe what he terms fanboys.


    The foregoing is evidence of the fact that you can't distinguish irony from serious posting.


    Is that so ? By definition ?

    If you don't notice the logical flaw in this line of argument, I can't help you.


    They stand. And will be judged by the forum as a whole.
     
  13. safe_pa

    safe_pa Howlin' Mad Full Member

    1,919
    0
    Apr 23, 2006
    I do think so. I've been on this board far longer than you and some of the abuse I got before the Lacy fight because I am a Calzaghe fan was so far past unreasonable it's not funny. Take China Hand Joe for example, alot he says can't be taken seriously when it comes to Joe, but IMO he says these things to counter the BS we have had to put up with for being born outside of the US and A. I wish the forum never crashed so I could show you the threads I'm on about.
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yet more dog****. I will never be ashamed of using boxrec in the face of your ESB superiority, as I'm not a boxing encyclopedia, but that little fact was from memory, someone else brought it up in a debate last week.

    I think you are confused as to the conversation, as your response is of little relevance. Like most Calzaghe fans, you are so eager to defend your idol, you rattle off a lightning reply that means nothing. Think about it without panicking at criticism of Joe: the discussion was not about 'dominance in a fight', it was about the chances of a stoppage. The guy first said the only chance of a stoppage is if Joe swarms him, I agreed because that is indeed the way Joe stops most opponents- his record of 30 TKOs from 32 stoppages does suggest the guy is right in his assumption. What has that got to do with all this balljuice about dominance and Hearns-Leonard and Oscar De La Hoya????

    If you don't know the difference between Tarver-Jones or Tszyu-Judah and Calzaghe-Manfredo, that's your problem. FYI, the ref waved off the Tszyu-Judah fight because Judah couldn't walk and wouldn't have beat the count. FYI, the ref waved off the Tarver-Jones fight because Jones was lying on the canvas and didn't know what day it was. The fight we were talking about- Calzaghe v Manfredo, was nothing like the same situation. As you are a Calzaghe fan and you have taken it upon yourself to defend his honour, I find it strange you are not aware that many of Calzaghe's stoppage wins have came in circumstances more akin to the Manfredo fight than Tszyu-Judah or Tarver-Jones. Hit youtube and find out if you don't believe me. I forgot, you're a walking encyclopedia who doesn't need to consult anything to refresh your memory.

    The guy implied he didn't think Calzaghe had it in him to 1-punch KO Jones, I agreed and cited why I thought so. If people genuinely think that's bias, I will willingly surrender to you Fanboys forever.
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    OK, instead of starting a bitchy argument and insulting me for agreeing with someone that Calzaghe's best chance of a stoppage was a swarm attack and not a proper KO (which I think even his own fans (not fanboys like you, normal rational fans) would agree with), I challenge you to find 10 posts of the 1500+ I have ever made on this forum that prove I am guilty of hate. If you are going to attack me for that, back it up or shove your accusations up your arrogant arsehole.

    If you are going to proclaim we shall be judged by the forum as a whole, how can you then discredit this poll as an example of irony?? Either the forum's opinion counts or it doesn't, you can't grin smugly at the delicious irony of a poll, then heroically say the forum will judge us. Caught out again.