If Johnson and Jeffries had fought close to their primes...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Jan 29, 2014.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think you underestimate the loathing for Nazi Germany in the 1930s (and Anglophilia among the upper classes during WWI a generation before) in the United States.

    The US just didn't have that many compelling interests in Europe. In either world war. It's not like the Germans had the resources to build a transatlantic invasion fleet -- or the logistical magic to do anything with a fleet if they'd had one. (Other than stare angrily across the Atlantic from the safety of occupied Europe and make vaguely rude noises).

    In any event, my secondary point stands regardless of America's actual motives. The US would have gone to war against Germany whether or not the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Rescuing Britain was one of the reasons. The USA was sympathetic towards GB, and did not like the Nazi's at all. Without GB hanging in there, Hitler takes Western Europe, and its over.

    Churchill meet FDR ( Half the time Churchill was drunk ) and discussed the situation. The USA also loaned out a lof of money for GB's re-build.

    Just be thankful the USA aided GB, otherwise you'd be speaking German, and force feed Klitschko on German TV.
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    This is correct. War with Germany would have happened anyway. If GB was winning or in a stalemate, perhaps not...but they were on the verge of collapsing.

    Pearl Harbor was a failure for Japan as all of the air craft carriers had conveniently left the islands of Hawaii, which at the time was not even a US State. This possibly means the USA knew an attack was likely.

    The bombing merely swung public opinion to expedite the official deceleration of war.
     
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    There's no way the Germans could have taken the UK. Even if they'd reached the Urals and crushed everybody else. Postwar simulations held by the British military (on several occasions) showed that Sealion would have failed even if the Royal Navy and RAF had completely disappeared. Historians agree with them.

    And even if the Germans do get across the Channel, the British would hit European agriculture with Operation Vegetarian. (Anthrax bio-warfare). Not to mention that the British had started work on the Bomb.

    Even if the US had stayed out, the best case scenario for the Nazis is holding Europe and European Russia. They'd be too busy dealing with guerrilla resistance to do much to the US -- or Britain, for that matter. (As Ukrainian Slavs, the Klitschkos would either be dead or legally prohibited from receiving an education, as per Generalplan Ost).
     
  5. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Agreed.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would say that your first point is highly debatable, but not to drift off topic.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,833
    51,935
    Mar 21, 2007
    Hell yes it's debatable. I'd say it's flat out incorrect, as far as we can know anything.

    I also would like to know where the notion that Britain was on the "verge of collapsing".


    It's astonishing how much ignorance there is about something so well documented as the second world war.
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Most likely outcome without the US is a stalemate between Nazi Europe and the Soviet Union / UK. Being European probably sucks for a very long time afterward.

    Yeah, they weren't going to go under anytime soon. But they would have taken a pounding from German U-Boats and the Japanese picking off whatever they could grab in the East.

    Subtract the US, and nobody (except Germany and possibly the US itself) comes away from the 1940s happy.
     
  9. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    Wait there were two of those things?
     
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    They'd originally just planned the first one, but it became such a hit that they decided to make a sequel.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    There is little doubt that the Soviet Union would have beaten Nazi Germany if the D Day landings had not taken place.

    The only question is whether British/US economic aid allowed them to get to that point.

    This content is protected
     
  12. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Certainly possible, but the Germans wouldn't have to keep nearly as many troops on the Atlantic Wall. They could also fall back on interior lines as the Soviets moved forward, without worrying about a second front.

    The Soviets, for their part, wouldn't get American supplies, which means that those crucial production resources would need to shift to trucks, coats, and spam instead of T-34s. Then you can add the fact that American bombers aren't pounding Berlin (with more effective tactics than Bomber Command used), the Brits need to worry more about the Far East, etc.

    Red Europe is one of the cards on the table, yeah. It's either that or a draw. If the former, it's going to take a while to crack Germany.

    Either way, being a 1940s European still sucks.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,833
    51,935
    Mar 21, 2007
    According to who? Hastings and Clark both have Germany losing to the Soviet Union without any involvement from Britain or America.


    Disagree. It would be nobody.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,833
    51,935
    Mar 21, 2007

    Right on, Jizzle.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,008
    Feb 15, 2006