Lot of people on here saying that Joe needs to beat Pavlik to add any credence to his legacy. As they did, Pre-Lacy Pre-Kessler Pre-Hopkins. So to you very people, what will you say when Joe beats and RJJ and Pavlik loses to Kessler in 2009 ? If you disagree with my predictions, just humour me and tell me what you will say about Joe Calzaghe IF they were to come true.
LOL. Dude you are playing 'victim' here. There are only a couple of people that says Joe needs that. Joe HAS proven himself. Pavlik would of course be a good opponent, but it is not a necessary fight. Not like Lacy or evenmoreso Kessler was.
I'm amazed by the amount of people who forget so quickly. It seems it's Pavlik or bust for a big % of people on here.
When Kessler beats Pavlik brutally, we'll all rejoice and say 'I told you so' as we dish out copious amounts of humble pie, with a side plate of dead steaming crow.
Yes mate - and this wasn't aimed at you. It was aimed at the peope who think the opposite to us :good
Kessler 'destroys' Pavlik???? HAAAAAAA. If Kessler couldn't knock Joe C. down with all those straight rights, but Calzaghe got knocked down by Hopkins, no way Kessler is hurting Pavlik. Not saying it wouldn't be a good fight though...