If Khan had a mediocre/ok chin how far could he go?

callazo was conviently moved to that postion and judah as i said in three months it will be knocking on four years since he beat a genuine top ten contender

 

thats all i ever wanted hatton to do

 

So he was in the top 10, just say he wasn't deserving instead of more blatant lies that you know are lies. And there's that many that haven't done much in divisions that get in the top 10,

 

is callazo now in the top ten on merit and was he there on merit before the khan fight , i have stated no lies might have miss judged by a few months , please point out theses lies

so in three months time how long as it been since khan beat a merited or ligitiment top ten fighter :think
you have the exact number on one hand

who is teddy baldock / waiting fo an awnser


who is the youngest undisputed unified champion / waiting for an awnser


what age did naz win his world title / waiting for an awnser


once you have awnsered the above and then labeling me a liar what category does your bum chum / alt fight time come under :think

 

NOT walking onto punches would help....

 

Callazo wasn't a top 10 fighter mate. The ABC belts rankings do not count.

Ring rankings.

 

No he was top 10 when Khan fought him and why not? he was top 10 by every boxing organization rankings.

and I'm not your mate.

 

Source?

He was top 10 with one, the WBA.

Quit being such a sensitive guy. The Ring is what matters since the ABC belts rankings are constantly manipulated- and they can't rank belt holders in other orgs. They don't reflect an accurate top 10 and Callazo just wasn't a top ten fighter.

Here's the WBA's top 10 right now:

1. Keith Thurman
2. Marcos Rene Maidana
3. Amir Khan
4. Leonard Bundu
5. Teerachai Kratingdaeggym
6. Shawn Porter
7. Diego Chaves
8. Ionut Dan Ion
9. Jermell Charlo
10. Richmond Djarbeng

Here's the Rings:

c.Floyd
1.Pac
2. Bradley
3.Marquez
4.Brook
5.Maidana
6.Porter
7.Thurman
8.Guerrero
9.Khan
10.Alexander

I suppose you agree Kratingdaeggym, Bundu and Chaves are top ten welterweight and ranked ahead of Pac and Floyd then. Callazo hasn't been near the top 10 since 2007.

 

I was talking about the time when he fought Collazo you inbred tool :rofl


He was ranked #2 by WBA and #7 by WBC and well within top 10 by the rest.


*salute of my middle finger for ya*

 

I can't post the link since i'm not registered for 50 days.

but youtube the fight and listen to the fighters introduction b4 the fight.

 

No **** you moron. atsch

You really are stupid. My post was pointing out that it doesn't matter that he was ranked with the ABC belts. That doesn't make him a top ten WW.

He hasn't sniffed the Ring top ten since 2007.

Or do you agree that Kratingdaeggym, Dan Ion and a Charlo are current top ten Welerweights and Pac and Brook aren't.

IT doesn't matter, you don't have a clue. Callazo just wasn't a top ten welterweight, and only Khan fans would claim he was

And he wasn't in the top ten for the IBF or WBO at all.

 

again he was top 10 ranked by all WW boxing organization rankings, you can't change the facts :thumbsup

 

Learn to read. Kratingdaeggym, Dan Ion and one of the Charlo's are ranked right now (Not that you know who any of these boxers are). That doesn't make them top ten WW's.

You don't seem to know to much about how boxing works. The Ring's rankings are what matters.

Are you exclusively a Khan fan?

And no he wasn't top ten ranked by the IBF and WBO. You're just making 'facts' up now.

 

you arnt lying by any chance are you ^ trying to rewirte history again , fact is khan aint done **** for nigh on four years and your all banging on about a may fight :rofl

 

no one as awnsered the questions i put to you boys ummmmmmmmmmm