If Khan had a mediocre/ok chin how far could he go?

looking at the rings ranking khan is 9th, he's beaten Maidana, based on UK bookmakers he's slight favourite against Brook, think he'd be favourite against Guerrero/ alexander if they fight.

with a better chin to cover up some of his errors, he could potentially be as high as 3,

Khan should have fought a lot more in the last 2/3 years, and it would be a lot easier to determine how good he is /isn't at WW.

 

Collazo was ranked top 10 by all boxing organization rankings ,its a fact you can google his rankings before the fight.

and Khan beating Collazo is a better win than Broner at WW :good

 

'fact'

You do know there are more than boxing orgs.

Not that it matter where he was ranked with any of them.

:rofl:rofl :hi:


Khan right now is only fringe top ten himself.

 

So where do you rank Collazo, the time he fought Khan?


and where do you rank Guerrero now? and whats gonna be ur excuse when khan schools guerrero in better fashion than floyd did?

 

as put before , in the other orgs brook aint there niether pac etc etc so or these others fighters who are above them more deserving of a fight with may :think

awnser the questions from earlier
:bart:rofl

and ask yourself why gbp got there new york liecence revoked

 

Yes I stand by my statement.



Khan putting a schooling on Collazo > Maidana win over Broner a WW.


Broner is basically a lightweight jumping up 2 weight divisions barely scratched a win (lost in many's eyes) against Paulie, then got blown away by Maidana. While Collazo was a established WW coming off a 2nd Rd KO win over Ortiz.

Hows this piece of **** broner a better win than collazo at WW?

offcourse u know ur stuff.

 

No they are deserving too of a fight against Mayweather, I'd love for him to fight Pacman.

but u said collazo wasn't ranked top 10, :hi: guess what ur a liar and an idiot :hi:

also i said khan has the style to beat mayweather.

 

You didn't even know who Callazo was until Khan fought him. I certainly wouldn't have had him at #2

Probably around #20-#15. I'm not sure where the Ring had him, but it wasn't top 10.

It doesn't matter anyway, saying he was a top ten welterweight at the time is just rewriting history. He has never been a top ten welterweight.

Guererro is a legitimate top 10- he is and always has been better than Callazo. I've been a big fan of his since he beat Katsidis. He's ranked where it matters anyway. I even pick Khan to beat him, and would like to see Khan against Mayweather, doesn't change the fact that the last top ten fighter he fought absolutely trashed him and he hasn't had a top level win since 2010.

Callazo was a good stay busy win, it was far from a great win.

I'd like to see Khan-Brook more than Khan Mayweather, I'd pick Brook. I'm also very excited about Khan-Guerrero, it's a great fight.

 

Guerrero is a bum what was his best win?

berto

 

okay.

 

You can stand by it all you want. It doesn't make it true.

Khantards.

 

Jesus boxing_master. You're a funny funny guy.

Fight Floyd = bum.

 

why did the coward fight ghost for when he clearly is bum?

 

What?

English mother****er. Learn it.

 

me no speek engliish veery well why coward fight ghost he bum:nut