If Lacy & Kessler continue doing nothing, how will Joe be remembered in 30 years?

It is indeed a legitimate question - thank you.

TFFP, you allege 50% of my activity is about Calzaghe. An easy way to test this - search the threads started by me. The 1st page contains 25. Of that 25, TWO feature the name Calzaghe.

One is this one, which you yourself stated was a valid question.

The other is a thread called "If JMM beats Casamayor while Calzaghe beats up a faded legend, should JMM jump to p4p#2?" - if you check the poll score you will find this thread has also been deemed valid by the forum, and it is as much about Marquez as it is about Calzaghe.


TFFP when will you learn your lesson? You continually accuse me of hate and bias, and without fail the hard facts always prove you wrong. :hi:

 

Calzaghe doesn't have a claim you tit, it's Marquez who has a legitimate claim. And this thread couldn't have anything less to do with pound-for-pound rankings or Mayweather or Pacquiao, as you would know if you weren't a ******. Log out journeyman.

 

See my response to TFFP 2 posts earlier. Another ****wit proven wrong. :smoke

 

Kessler is not a great boxer IMO, but his size and strength mean he is excellent at 168. When he met someone as strong and resilient as himself but with better skills in Joe C, he lost.

Kessler would beat Bute and anyone else at 168. I think Taylor is a more skilled fighter and would give Kessler a difficult fight, but Kessler would be too strong for him in the end, the way he is for most.

I think Pavlik and Abraham would give Kessler a great fight. I can't pick a winner there, real 50/50s. At a push, I'd say Pavlik beats Kessler and Kessler beats Abraham, but I can't say either way with confidence.

However, at light-heavyweight where Kessler's size and strength would not be such an advantage, I think he would struggle. I would pick Calzaghe (obviously), Dawson, Tarver and Johnson to beat him there. Many will scoff at my choice of Johnson, but if you compare the Johnson of the Dawson fight with the Kessler of Kessler's last 2 fights, I really think Glen could do it. He is strong as a bull and would just keep coming at Kessler.

 

Your petty insults and abuse are exactly the response I expected to being definitively proven wrong by fact. Pathetic.

FACT - the majority of my posts aren't about him.

FACT - he seems to be the subject of most threads on this forum and I am on this forum quite often, therefore it is normal for me to comment on these threads.

I work freelance at a computer, so I can be on here as much or as little as I wish. I enjoy it, therefore I am on a lot. I will never be ashamed of that, it's a lot of fun.

If you read the thread 'PACFAN84: The Calzaghe Hater' which was not made by me, then you will realize what a silly child you are being.

Do you nurse a semi every time you think about him? - What an infantile little troll you are. You are the type of poster I try to avoid. Goodbye :hi:

 

As usual, I was only retaliating, I did not attack you, I did not start this. That is clear for all to see.

That 2 of my last 25 thread-titles have featured the name 'Calzaghe' (this one which a known Calzaghe fanatic accepted IS a valid question to ask, the other being a thread about JM Marquez as much as it is about Calzaghe) is a stone-cold fact, which does disprove your accusations whether you like it or not. Stop replying troll, there is no need for us to converse as you view objective criticism as hate, therefore we have no common ground. Back to the fanboy playground for you and the other 'huggers' and 'haters'.