If Lara lost, why didn't Mayweather and Brook lose?

canelo hit air and elbows with most of his punches, I can see a draw do to Laras inactivity but I jus can't find 7 rounds for ginger much less 9 like martinez did... Imo ginger didn't win, lara blew it.

 

Maybe the reason is because some people feel canelo won, brook won and Mayweather won.

 

Boxing scoring should not be subjective. There is guideline by which a fight is evaluated and judges should comply by that guideline. Saying scoring is subjective leaves room for robbery and all kinds of corruption.

 

Nailed...

 

I agree but it is still subjective as each judge is looking at the fight from his own particular perspective and they are positioned at different locations around the ring, which makes their visual perspective different.

 

Both Lara and Maidana "lost " before they even took their ring walks.
Floyd cannot lose in Vegas that's obvious. Canelo is Oscar's cash cow they'll pay to make sure he doesn't get beat. BOTH these fights were orchestrated decisions
As for Porter ?? He just plain got BEAT by Brooke
What I'd like to know is Why did CJRoss get fired for her ridiculous 114-114 card in Floyd - Canelo Yet the clown that scored 117-111 for Floyd over Maidana didn't?? It was just as ludicrous a decision. Oh sorry I forgot he scored FOR Floyd so that was ok Silly me:barf

 

i just want to throw pacquio against bradley in there aswell, in the first couple of roundsi thought the actual amount of clean punches they threw were very close but the commentators went on like pacquio was dominating, i just can see any consisteny brook was on the retreat in the beggining and was forced into holding and landed very little but it seems to be considered ashutting out porter