If Lucian Bute is not the IBF Champ, then neither was Lacy and neither was Joe!

That wasn't the issue here anyway. I thought you were talking about peoples perception of who the IBF "champ" is at 168 not who necessarily the best fighter was.

 

i think I mis read you're post a little, i thought you were implying the patronisation was between he and I somehow. After re-reading, I realize that wasnt the intent, so my bad.

Thank the MIS-MANGEMENT of Boxing for the convoluted and absurd "championship' picture.:good I prefer the term titlelist to "Champion" as it helps avoid confusion when there actually exist's a REAL CHAMPION which is undoubtedly joe calzaghe.

To the IBF Bute is "Champion", to the real world, he's a titlelist. We should be thankful that at least the IBF still currently only recognises one "champion" still

 

I dont think they mean the "real" IBF champ though. Joe is the champ regardless of what the IBF say. Theres a fundamental difference that I can't believe is still being debated.

 

Whats strange? Sorry, I don't understand that comment you will need to enlighten me.

 

Lucian Bute is the only and true IBF Champion !!!

 

I'm ready to die...

 

Can't believe I've been drawn into this again. For the last time I dont care what the WBC/WBA/IBF/WBO say. The true champ is readily identifiable in each division & thats all that matters.

I really thought people were letting go of the bloody alphabets.:roll:

 

naaah JC is the real unified absolute superduper ****ing champion and bute is merely holding a title that really should belong to joe c

 

A true champ that will be facing old timers...Hopkins and Jones. I guess he needs the money...