If Lucian Bute is not the IBF Champ, then neither was Lacy and neither was Joe!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Nov 6, 2007.


  1. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    I'll leave you lot to your boring conversation.
     
  2. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Finally, we got rid of him! Thanks, Pharaoh!:D
     
  3. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Sorry, Decebel...Bute holds a title, but Calzaghe holds the championship at 168lbs.
     
  4. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Instead of acting like a petulant child why not just say, can you not post on my thread? Be a man not an internet keyboard warrior.
     
  5. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Bute is the real IBF champ. End of.

    It's only a title afterall. What's the fuss about?

    Calzaghe = Champ

    Bute = IBF titleholder
     
  6. Boxer-puncher

    Boxer-puncher Active Member Full Member

    808
    1
    Dec 26, 2007
    Bute owns a paper title, that's it.
     
  7. Paulie

    Paulie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,049
    0
    Oct 15, 2007
    Lucian Bute is the worst nightmare of Big Joe Calzaghe who likes to fight old timers for money he dosen't need !!

    Way the go Superchamp !!!
     
  8. The Italarican

    The Italarican Pretty Good Poster Full Member

    1,449
    2
    Jul 16, 2005
    Saw the thread title.
    Saw the poster.
    Not much has changed.
     
  9. The Italarican

    The Italarican Pretty Good Poster Full Member

    1,449
    2
    Jul 16, 2005
    I hope HBO keeps up with the "X division titleholder" description they've had instead of glorifying ABC belts. Hopefully others will fall in line too.
     
  10. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    calzaghe never lost that belt in the ring, so he still owns that belt as far as i'm concerned. he's just loaning it to bute. bute though is still a solid smw.
     
  11. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Why the "sorry" bit? When have I ever disagreed with that?:think
     
  12. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :-( 'twas a JOKE! :patsch
     
  13. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :lol: How shall I take that? In a bad way, I guess...welcome back, mate!:good
     
  14. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    :good spot on
     
  15. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Okay sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm even more sorry this stupid thread has been bumped up again.

    Thats exactly what we need all networks/channels to do.:good