If Manny does not agree to the 5/5/12 date then it's clear he is doing the ducking!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sdsfinest22, Nov 6, 2011.


  1. horst

    horst Guest

    No mention of Pac and drugs...

    No mention of Pac and drugs...

    No mention of Pac and drugs...

    What? We might have to fight him?!

    Pac takes drugs!

    Pac takes drugs!

    Help!!

    :rofl
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    Floyd adapts and is more versatile than James was-

    JAMES TONY WAS A GREAT COUNTER PUNCHER-Floyd adapts to style though-

    Floyd will fight smart with Pac-PAC HAS POWER AND FLOYD KNOWS THIS- FLOYD CAN "LEAD" MORE EFFICTIVELY THAN HE CAN "BOX OFF HIS BACK FOOT" THEN HE WILL

    IF FLOYD CAN "BOX OFF HIS BACK FOOT" BETTER THAN HE CAN "LEAD" THEN HE WILL.

    Best post you've made in this entire thread right here:good..now these are good posts-
     
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    Horrible rebuttal to what I just posted..I think your still trying to rebuttal something I owned you with from 5 posts ago-

    Keep playing catch up Popkins:deal:hi::good
     
  4. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    lol-everytime u get owned you get TO A POST THAT HAS TO DO WITH "*****S" OR U "INSULT"

    UR GARBAGE BRO-AS A POSTER YOUR PATHETIC-ITS CLEAR YOU ONLY WATCH PAC AND WHATS GOING ON AROUND HIM-

    PLEASE GO TALK BOXING WITH OTHER *******S-I'M HERE TO TALK BOXING WITH REAL FIGHT FANS-

    ALSO, I COULD PUT UP A BETTER ARGUMENT THAN YOU AS TO WHY PAC "SHOULD FIGHT FLOYD NEXT" WITH NOTHING BUT GOOD $HIT TO SAY ABOUT MANNY PAC:deal-UR A ******* AND HATER, WHICH TELLS ME THAT YOU COULD NOT DO THE SAME WITH AN ARGUMENT SUPPORTING FLOYD-

    BRO, I RECOGNIZE ITS ALL SPECULATED TO OPINION..NOT SAYING IT ISN'T.

    BUT IF YOU LOOK AT EVERYTHING, IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER, FROM DEC, 2008 UNTIL NOW..ITS CLEAR AS DAY THAT TEAM PACQUIAO HAS NEVER WANTED THIS FIGHT-:deal

    DON'T MIND MY BASHING YOU-I NEVER GET PERSONAL AND I ALWAYS KEEP IT "BOXING ORIENTED":good:thumbsup
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    Sorry to tell u but its the truth..DONT ASK IF U DONT LIKE IT DUMMY..

    TYPICAL ******* AGAIN

    *******S

    1. IGNORE FACTS

    2. DOWNGRADE VALID INFO

    3. PAY 0 ATTENTION TO ANY ARGUMENT THAT IS NEGATIVE TO THEIR OWN.

    4. DO NOT ADDRESS FACTS SHOWN TO THEM, IN REBUTTAL TO THEIR ORIGINAL RESPONSE

    5. INSULT THE POSTER, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND; BY DOING THIS THEY LOSE THE ARGUMENT EASY AS THEY DONT EVEN ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THEIR OPPOSITION IS PUTTING UP.

    6. COME UP WITH OFF THE WALL $HIT WITH NOTHING TO BACK IT, JUST TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY SAID SOMETHING VALID; MANY TIMES THIS OFF THE WALL $HIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BOXING.


    IN THIS THREAD, YOUR GUILTY OF-
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6

    ALL OF EM BASICALLY
    UR GARBAGE ON THIS FORUM *******:deal:hi:-GO BE ONE OF THE *******S WHO DELETES THEIR NAME, AND MAKES A NEW ONE OR SOMETHING SO I CAN BASH ON "SOMEONE DIFFERENT"..GETTING TO EASY TO DO THIS TO YOU.

    TELL ROID TO FIGHT FLOYD-

    ROID HAS TO THINK ABOUT FIGHTING FLOYD CUZ ROID KNOWS HE WILL BE HIT WITH RIGHT HANDS

    ROID WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET IN POSITION TO HIT FLOYD, DUE TO FLOYD'S MUCH BETTER FOOTWORK AND MUCH LONGER ARMS-

    ROID IS ROID:bart

    YEA, I THINK THE BELL JUST RUNG
    SCHOOL IS OUT FOR YA BUDDY:bbb:deal
     
  6. horst

    horst Guest

    Way to repeat what I just said, but do it less articulately... :rofl
     
  7. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    BACK TO THREAD TOPIC-

    I made this thread before the Pacquiao-Marquez 3 fight-

    Pacquiao did not beat Marquez CONVINCINGLY-BUT FLOYD DOES NOT SEEM TO MIND, WHATEVER THE CASE-AND FLOYD STILL WANTS THE FIGHT WITH PACQUIAO ON MAY 5, 2012 AT THE MGM GRAND

    ALL PAC HAS TO DO NOW IS STEP UP AND OWN 2 AND 3...AND THEN HE'LL GET THE FIGHT-

    BUT BY 0 MEANS DID HE "BEAT MARQUEZ CONVINCINGLY"
     
  8. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    :good

    RIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTTTTTT.......:!::patsch

    GET ON THREAD TOPIC-DONE WITH SUNNN-TOO EASY-U MAKE IT A LITTLE MORE INTERESTING:deal
     
  9. horst

    horst Guest


    "I could beat the same Pac that beat Hatton & Cotto"


    "Well Floyd, do you want to do it then?"


    "Err... No, coz he might be on drugs!!"


    "But if you could thrash him the way he is, then just do it?"


    "Err... No, coz he might be on drugs!"


    "But if you could thrash the same guy who beat Hatton & Cotto, then what do you care? Thrash him, take his p4p title, take the mantle of the Greatest Fighter Of This Generation, and take the $60m?"


    "Err... No, coz he might be on drugs!"


    "But if you could thrash him anyway, what do you care?"


    "Err... you never give me a fair shake! He a little yellow midget! He make me some fried rice! No-one ever gives me a fair shake! Fiddy! Fiddy! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!" :|:|:|
     
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    *******S

    1. IGNORE FACTS

    2. DOWNGRADE VALID INFO

    3. PAY 0 ATTENTION TO ANY ARGUMENT THAT IS NEGATIVE TO THEIR OWN.

    4. DO NOT ADDRESS FACTS SHOWN TO THEM, IN REBUTTAL TO THEIR ORIGINAL RESPONSE

    5. INSULT THE POSTER, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND; BY DOING THIS THEY LOSE THE ARGUMENT EASY AS THEY DONT EVEN ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THEIR OPPOSITION IS PUTTING UP.

    6. COME UP WITH OFF THE WALL $HIT WITH NOTHING TO BACK IT, JUST TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY SAID SOMETHING VALID; MANY TIMES THIS OFF THE WALL $HIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BOXING.


    IN THIS THREAD, YOUR GUILTY OF-
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6

    :hi:
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    SOURCE EM AND I'LL RESPOND....THESE ARE MADE UP QUOTES-I ALWAYS BRING VALID SOURCES..:deal

    UR JUST QUOTING OFF THE WALL $HIT POPKINS..TRY AGAIN-SERIOUS BRO LETS SEE YOUR ARGUMENT

    NONE OF THIS CHILD $HIT...LETS SEE WHY YOUR IN THE "RIGHT" WITH YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE "PAC-MAYWEATHER" NEGOTIATIONS/EVENTS/DRAMA/ETC...WHATEVER YOU WANNA CALL IT:deal

    EXPLAIN IT:think
     
  12. persianprince

    persianprince Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,890
    120
    Mar 29, 2011
    From alex ariza: Me, pac and Roach want's this fight, but BOB doesn't !
     
  13. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    OK:good

    Well Bob said, that if Pac wanted Floyd he could have him, BUT PAC WOULD HAVE TO TELL HIM THAT.:deal

    WHAT PAC WANTS IS WHAT MATTERS-CURRENTLY, PAC IS "MAKING A DECISION AFTER XMAS"..

    NO REASON TO WAIT-COME OUT AND SAY U WANT FLOYD NOW-OSCAR DID IT IN THEIR MEGA FIGHT-PLUS THERE IS NOTHING TO THINK ABOUT-

    Pac can fight "Marquez 4" after he fights Mayweather:good
     
  14. merkinball

    merkinball Member Full Member

    176
    0
    Jan 10, 2010
    Yeah yeah yeah! Happy now?:tired
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    Exactly. There is no answer to this, is there? :think

    You know it. :smoke