lmfao @ 10x the win. Canelo win was way better than the overrated Bradley. Arguably Bradley has only 1 win at ww, and that wni was against an old man who isn't even a natural ww, and had his best days at 135. Canelo a hypejob? What were those controversial decisions? If you truly dont know anyhting about boxing you'll bring up the trout decision. The lara decision was no robbery, a robbery was marquez/pac 1-3. Now what's the third controversial decision mr. casual fan? Also yes, Pacquiao fought Hatton after he suffered a brutal knock out by Floyd. Good on him. Pacquaio also fought a drained as **** Oscar who had not fought at ww for almost a decade after floyd beat him.
Floyd gets some credit. Pac's coming off of a brutal KO just 2 years ago. History will show that he ducked Pac for 5 years.
You sound like someone who wasn't watching boxing back when PBF and Hatton were both at 140 back in 2005 so please don't make comments about things you have no idea about.:hi:
Duran of course, but it was a totally different era. Back then fighters still wanted to dominate their divisions. Hagler is the second greatest middleweight ever (Monzon is a badass). Duran us the greatest lightweight of all time. On top of that Duran went on to neadd to that feat by capturing belts in other divisions. Now in respects to this generation Floyd is top 3 best 130 ever. And went on to win titles in other divisions all while being undefeated. Manny never dominated a division to be called the best or one of the best ever in any division. Manny's whole career is based on winning titles in multiple divisions. To me this is something you are supposed to do to augment your legacy not the basis for it. Everyone has their own opinions and criteria, this is just mine.