If Manuel Charr causes an upset..

Than he should sign a deal that guarantees just that. Or does the 'guy' have a **** promoter or something?

 

Manuel Charr don't do promoters.

 

As a big Klitschko fan their stipulations that require fighting the other brother if they win are bull****. I don't want to hear about **** like that.

 

:good

 

Vitali appears shaken by Charr's confidence. This fight is a real toss-up at this point.

 

ok so purrity signed a contract stating he had to fight vitali if he beat wlad...sorry your wrong (again)..ok sanders signed a contract stating he had to fight vitali if he beat wlad..sorry your wrong (again)..its like yous just dont have any shame..you are blinded by hate,hate does that..see what i did there??muppet..

and a perfect example of love is your obbsession with big lenny lol...

im a huge fan of lenny but dear lord you rip the arse out of it..at the end of the day pushing a unification fight and getting a rematch yourself just cannot be argued against.no matter how you phrase it..and please stop making stuff up about them putting it in their contracts before they where champions because they never.and look what happend...purrity after beating wlad wanted a go at vitali..sanders after beating wlad choose to fight vitali instead of the rematch..now please for the love of god stop talking complete and utter shite

 

vidic why the shite??you dont think its acceptable for them to push for the uni fight???your some boxing fan..you want them to go and defend against bums instead of unifying the division??take your hatred elsewhere..if one of them wasnt a champion then it would be bollix..how ever..........

 

im sorry guys.but in no way do i find there anything wrong with forcing a unification fight to make an undisputed champion..if indeed one of them was beltless then yes it would be ****ed up completly..but i find nothing wrong with it..money split issues over it should be champion takes bigger split though..

 

Pushing for a unification fight is one thing

Having it in the contract that you have to fight a completely different person from the Champ you are facing is bull**** man, absolute bull****

It's nothing to do with hatred, it's just common sense. Rematch clauses are fair enough, if someone gives you a shot and you beat them, it's fair game to ask for a rematch

But to say, if you beat me, you have to fight my brother?

Come on that's laughable, and that's the definition of a slave contract

Wlad and Vitali won't unify their OWN belts and face eachother, so how can you say it's acceptable for them to contractually force someone ELSE to unify? :huh

 

Too much truth . . .

Bull**** contractual stipulations.

 

Wlad's last fight was an insult to boxing fans. Putting on a disgracful match up like that and expect people to be interested. He says he didn't want the fight but im sure he had the power not to take it. This nobody Charr is equally as pityful for Vitaly. They are ment to represent the top dogs of the division but only choose to fight meatsacks.

 

Mearsacks n all charr gana be upset allright .........

 

..