If Marciano Had Fought Valdes,Baker,& Henry?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Feb 28, 2024.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nino beat more ranked heavyweights than ;
    Moore,Marciano,Cockell,Lastarza.
    Here is174 1/2'bs Cockell being stopped by162 1/2 lbs Turpin.
    Randy Turpin vs Don Cockell
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2025
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,954
    13,601
    Jun 30, 2005
    Do you think that Nino Valdez was a big 6'3", 200+ pound heavyweight of comparable ability to later 6'3", 200+ pound contenders like Witherspoon?
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    He beat more ranked contenders.
    I think he was of superior ability to.
    Mathews,Cockell,that version of Louis,Layne,Lastarza ,and apart from@
    Walcott Moore and Charles,whom he beat.superior to every other one of Marciano's opponents.
    I also think Valdes would have fitted in okay with
    Page
    Witherspoon
    Bruno
    Coetzee
    Young
    Bey
    Tucker
    Tubbs
    Thomas
    Jones
    Ocasio
    Williams
    Cooney
    LSpinks
    M Spinks
    Biggs
    Cobb
    Dokes
    Knoetzee
    Bugner
    Evangelista
    Coopman
    Dunn
    Pulev
    Martin
    Tillis
    Snipes
    Mercado
    Berbick
    Bodell
    H Cooper
    B Cooper
    Roman
    Weaver
    Tate
    Ledoux
    Ward
    Merritt
    Boudreaux
    Boytsov
    Glazkov
    Arreola
    Helenius
    Solis
    Stiverne
    Ortiz
    Breazeale
    Gomez
    Kownacki
    Miller
    Hunter
    Wach
    PIanetta
    Purrity
    Mormeck
    Wallin
    Thompson
    Mason
    Ackinwande
    Izon
    Seldon
    Oquendo
    Jefferson
    Bean
    Auston
    Brock
    Kevin Johnson
    K Johnson
    Leapai
    Franklin
    Takam
    Barrett
    Perez
    Virchis
    Dimitrenko
    McCline
    Mormeck
    Grant
    NGannou
    Brewster
    Lyackovich
    Molina
    Harrison

    Hope that answers your question?
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2025
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,954
    13,601
    Jun 30, 2005
    It answers my question. We'll just have to disagree, then. I don't see much special about Valdez to rate him alongside heavyweight Michael Spinks or Tim Witherspoon in terms of actual ability as a heavyweight. All of your criticism of the quality of Marciano era contenders supports this, frankly. Compared to, say, Spinks's accomplishment of beating an older Larry Holmes, it doesn't say much for Valdez that he maxed out at almost getting a shot at the king of a bad era.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    This assumes he didn't get a shot at Marciano because he lost to Moore.
    You could equally say he didn't get a shot because Weill didn't fancy him as an opponent for his meal ticket.
    Ranked while Marciano was, either ranked or Champ were.
    Walls,Henry,Baker,Valdes,Maxim,Neuhaus,Williams,Gardner,Slade
    Johnson,Summerlin,Wallace,Norkus,Bivins,Oma,Sys,Harrison,Jackson,
    Satterfield, and Dunlap.
     
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,954
    13,601
    Jun 30, 2005
    Whether Marciano ducked him or not is irrelevant. I'm talking what he actually accomplished in the fights he had. He never beat the king of an era you rightly criticize as weak, with a division filled by lightheavyweights. Michael Spinks, to take one of the examples above, did beat an old Larry Holmes. That alone is enough to put Spinks out of Valdez's orbit.

    Valdez can defeat as many ranked guys from a weak era of lightheavyweights as he pleases (and lose to others), but I don't think that makes him comparable to the likes of Spinks or Witherspoon.
     
  7. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,431
    34,836
    Jul 4, 2014
    Yes, three men whose frames are bast suited for LHW or smaller. However you want to say it.

    You have all the facts but can't put them together. Valdes lost to smaller men, so beating him would have proven nothing. Nor did Marciano have anything to prove. He beat the best in front of him. That is how one becomes great.
     
  8. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,431
    34,836
    Jul 4, 2014
    Yes, I did. You just don't understand.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    I gave you a long list of heavyweights I think he holds his own with,from the 50's to the present era. Spinks might very well beat a Marciano the same age as Holmes was, does that prove,that he is better than the Valdes who beat number one contender Charles?
    Light heavyweights?
    Valdes beat
    London 211
    DeJohn 204 & 2001/2
    Erskine 1961/2
    Holman 204
    Richardson 2021/2
    Cockell 215
    Jackson190
    Sys 204
    Neuhaus 2121/2
    Wallace 1981/2

    NB I don't believe Marciano would duck anybody.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    Louis
    Moore
    Charles
    Walcott
    Ali
    Holmes
    Joshua
    Dubois

    Lost to smaller men.
    No,you become great by beating good/great opposition, not by wracking up an unbeaten streak a third to half of which are sausages that would fit in Lamar Clark's resume.
    And when your best opponents are:
    33,37,38 ,and 41 respectively , there will inevitably be asterisk attached to your resume.

    I think that puts it together rather well!
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,954
    13,601
    Jun 30, 2005
    And I disagree that Valdez would hold his own with the good 80s guys his own size. They didn't lose to tiny heavies/lightheavyweights like Moore and Satterfield, in weak divisions like the one you characterize Marciano as ruling.

    Cockell, as has been frequently pointed out, was a fat LHW who lost to a middleweight. Lots of the other guys you mentioned fought in a division where top guys included an ancient Joe Louis, LaStarza, a very small Ezzard Charles, etc.

    In other words, just like Vandez, mentioning their sizes alone -- or even their contender status -- doesn't tell the story.

    You need to look at the environment they came from. And that's an environment where men their size just weren't that good. An environment where the #1 guy was Rocky Marciano, whom you have characterized elsewhere as being small, not really a strikingly powerful puncher, crude, and easy to hit. Rocky's best opponents were old and/or small...and highly rated. So Nino ought not impress us very much as a heavyweight contender. It didn't take much to be one, by later standards. And the opponents who were Nino's own size whom he fought didn't even achieve what Nino managed. They needn't impress us much, either.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,361
    28,420
    Jun 2, 2006
    I know about the era, Louis was champ when I was born .
    I never mentioned in any of these Marciano threads,[only 1 of which is mine ,and that one a year and a half old ,]that he reigned in a weak era ,though I believe he did. "Tiny heavyweights ",like Moore dropped Marciano and caused him,by his own admission to momentarily black out.
    Something Moore could not manage to do in two fights with Valdes.

    I sense a growing hostility coming here so I think I will just let others continue with my old thread,I don't see anyone changing their opinion and posters saying stuff like "you cant put it together",though they invite tempting vocal oblivion,are hardly conducive to a balanced argument,so to avoid more Deja Vu. Bye!
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  13. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,954
    13,601
    Jun 30, 2005
    That's fine. I'm not being hostile. I just disagree with you about how good Valdez was. Anyway, take care.
     
  14. Jason Thomas

    Jason Thomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,261
    4,996
    Feb 18, 2019
    Matthews has a career upside that is generally ignored. One can knock his best wins, but he lost only to five men, one an experienced winning fighter when Harry was 17, one an undefeated heavyweight champion, two top five black murderers' row contenders, and a man who was a European and British Empire champion and a top five contender.

    Baker, Valdes, and Henry all lost to much lesser fighters than any Matthews lost to--think Buford, Zuany, Gilliam--and Matthews had a much longer career and more fights, and was rated over a longer period, from 1942 to 1954, and fought both younger and older or to about the same age.

    Not many can say they lost to only five men over a 19 year career in which they were rated in three different divisions.

    Matthews was a respected fighter in the early 1950's. The Ring Mazazine picked him over Robinson as the best p4p fighter of 1951.
     
  15. Jason Thomas

    Jason Thomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,261
    4,996
    Feb 18, 2019
    "If Cockell and LaStarza were ranked near the top that would indicate the lack of talent"

    Unlike Manuel Ramos in 1968? Or Ford Smith in 1935? Or Tom Heeney in 1928? All top five contenders. Ramos and Heeney got title shots also. I think Cockell has a good chance of running the table if matched with this trio.