No he did not sweep the first 6 rounds you can't score a fight to save your life if you say that. He won at most 4 of the first 6 rounds. Even so it was mainly due to PBF getting cut which had never happened to him before and it bothered him after he adjusted to it he basically shut Maidana out. Your last statement is even funnier you say "close fight but got robbed"??? How can a close fight be a robbery?:think
Because a close fight can have a very clear winner. If the wrong guy gets the decision, then it's a robbery. Gonzalez-Estrada was a damn close fight, but it would have been a robbery if Estrada had won becaue Gonzalez was the clear winner.
Nope. DLH has much better jab. Better outside game. Mosley has better workrate and power. Pacquiao has faster combos, more power, higher workrate, better angles. All this is prime for prime.
Oscar has 6 loses and lost more big fights than he won lesser fighters beat Oscar than PBF. Mosley has 9 loses and fought dumb lesser fighters beat Mosley than PBF. Pac has 6 loses and PBF was always a stylistic nightmare for him and no version of him would overcome PBF's reach reflexes and ring IQ advantage lesser fighters beat him than PBF. What do they all have in common loses and all of them lost to PBF.
Oscar was very close to beating Trinidad. That should have been his best win. He was outclassing Tito. If his dumbass corner hadn't told him they had the fight in the bag he wins that fight. Pacquiao has victories over prime versions of Barrera, Marquez and Cotto. Mosley beat DLH twice. Floyd's best win is Castillo.
Oscar didn't beat Tito he lost again who did he beat? PBF beat two of those guys and absolutely slaughters any version of Barrera Mosley win over Oscar is the best win I'll give you that. PBF's best win will probably end up being Canelo
Fight would never happen. Barrera's too small for Mayweather and you know it. We have weight classes. Oscar deserves some credit for the Tito performance.