If Marvin Hagler never existed who would be the champ

Not as much as Leonard or Hearns you stupid ****.

 

I never knew this forum allows open flaming for no reason, why wouldnt he make money fighting spinks if spinks made over 10 million fighting gerry cooney u stupid tijuana cabdriver. hagler only barks at small dogs, he isnt a top 20 atg. This fight would have made plenty of money, u dont know ****, so shut your ****in mouth.

 

I remeber Al Bernstien stating that Hamsho was the best of the rest in those years.

 

Lora you got a point. And the biggest name out there was the Sugarman

 

probably hearns

 

I would say most of the top contenders would take turns holding it. I always wondered how Hamsho would fare against Davison, Sibson, Obel, Don Lee, and Tony Ayala but only Hagler was great enough to dominate that pool of dep talent

 

Oh come he has not fought for three years, and he sucked no end when he did against Howard.

12 rounds, 15 rounds it makes no difference, Hagler inside three...

In fact, if Marvin does not win inside three rounds, may I be cursed with the name of a Journeyman Cruiserweight for the rest of my life!

All logic says Hagler/HearnsII is the way to go.

 

Hagler did not have the frame to move up in weight, only Duran looked smaller out of all the guys that moved up and fought Hagler.