If Mayweather beats Pac.......

Also a decade is just a PERIOD of ten years! there is no right or wrong way to describe a decade! So the award pac was given, which was from 2000-2009, was a DECADE. So how was he given the award when the decade wasnt over??

 

In his eyes it doesn't exist.

 

Make no mistake about it, Mayweather will beat pacman.

 

No.

end thread.

 

I can't believe 21 voted yes so far.

The vote is already gone.

Thats like saying if it turns out Obama was wrong on an issue in his previous debates with Mccain then Mccain should become president.:nut

 

He wouldn't need the award, him beating Pac while the world bare witness will be more then enough.

 

we have 21 people who are either idiots or hardcore joyboys.

 

I will have to admit that all my fellow Floyd fans have momentarily lost their marbles.:rofl

On a serious note though people get real. I think Floyd should have won FOTD, but I also admit that he dropped the ball by not taking out Cotto & Marg and that retirement story of his.

 

the poll should've been made public.

geez, 22 voted yes??!!!! damn.

 

This content is protected

 

I voted YES purely on the grounds of the decade not being over yet.

 

Yes, and if a movie that comes out in the 2010s that is better than the best one of the 2000s, it should be named best film of the last decade...:roll:

 

****ing hell.

Was 1930 part of the 20's?
Was 1940 part of the 30's?
Was 1950 part of the 40's?
Was 1960 part of the 50's?
Was 1970 part of the 60's?
Was 1980 part of the 70's?
Was 1990 part of the 80's?

THE DECADE IS OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

ummm its 2010... new decade...

 

try 3 years buddy 2005, 2006, and 2007..

and in no time throughout the 2000 prior to 2008 when mayweather retired was pac ever p4p ahead of mayweather...sorry

ur wrong!! know it all!!

http://www.theboxinghistorian.com/awards/p4p-history.html