Are you a judge? What is the basis of awarding rounds if you dont land? Some judges score fights the right way on meaningful activity.
See thats the thing I'V seen your posts before and always asking people to prove their points but you never prove yours.
mayweather would have been the same way, the apple dont fall to far from the tree.who knew he barley won that fight but you seen in the rematch what happend.plus he was injured in that fight and some in that training camp.so now if he gets hurt or is not 100 he then will do what he did in his up and coming fight with marquez !
Rounds should be awarded to however lands the most cleans shots, if no one is landing clean agression should be the deciding factor. For example. Cotto vs Clottey in the final rounds cotto wasn't landing a lot of clean shots but was still landing even though they were blocked. To me thats is aggression.
So I ask you to show something but you dont show it. And Im wrong? Show me the scorecard and ill answer you.
exactly Castillo was the agressor through out the entire fight and outworked and outlanded...now do you see, cus you just proved Castillo won.
I have nothing to say to others because it's understandable to dislike the hugely overinflated, superficial, fake ass kiddie ego PBF has developed in his life.... I always thought he's one of the best talents pound for pound, boxing has ever witnessed through history, but to constantly protect a major idiot like that.....it really seems to go beyond simply appreciating his talent...! It's easier for me to see why people could become unconditional nuthuggers and full time protectors of guys like Pacquiao, Calzaghe and Hatton for instance, because they are all quite personable and genuine !! So why do you protect him so much like he was your family or somethin' ?
cant really say. rjj lost one fight, and did'nt have a "0" to protect. that did'nt stop him from being reluctant roy.
Void lost his first fight with Castillo, fans knew that, so a rematch was ordered. I am sick of criminal judges.