If Mitchell was stopped, why wasn't Mayweather vs Mosley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, May 15, 2010.


  1. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Mitchell didn't have to cling on for dear life, Mitchell never looked like going down, he ate some big shots, but Mayweather ate the same and clung on for dear life, yet was allowed to continue.

    Someone explain why Mitchell was stopped and far less hurt than Mayweather was in round 2 vs Mosley?
     
  2. SHOTAT

    SHOTAT Scouse House Full Member

    732
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    There are some ****ing idiots on this forum.
     
  3. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    Because Mitchell didn't hold on, he turned away and didn't try to defend himself when it was stopped.

    If he was as experienced as Mayweather then perhaps he would have held to get his senses back.
     
  4. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    A scouser alias, Hi Max :rofl
     
  5. dubztep

    dubztep The Original Dub Full Member

    1,938
    0
    Sep 6, 2008
    That is the most ******ed statement ive ever seen on ESB. You've set the benchmark, congrats :tired
     
  6. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Why was mayweather allowed to hold as long as he did? usually refs make people break, Mayweather clung on for a good 40secs, now I think Mitchell was prematurely stopped, he more turned into a big punch than turned away, but I don't eblieve he was finished, however, Mayweatehr was out of it compared to Mitchell.
     
  7. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  8. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Ignored, one ***** down.
     
  9. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,042
    1,082
    Aug 6, 2005
    Wow, I always knew you were an idiot. Someone should sticky this thread so whenever some doubts it you can link to it and prove how stupid Anglosaxon is.
     
  10. MAYLO

    MAYLO Active Member Full Member

    817
    0
    May 21, 2009
    Because Shane only hit Floyd twice and 30 seconds later Floyd was back hittin Shane in his ****n face.
     
  11. dzesmin7

    dzesmin7 Active Member Full Member

    646
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    You're lucky you have the best signature on the internet.

    Otherwise I'd call for your banning.
     
  12. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    1 Shane shot was enough to Keep mayweather parading up and down looking for a shaft on ***** street for a good 40secs.
     
  13. mitchell lost, katsidis won end of, stop trying to look for something that just clearly isn't there,u just look like a tit!:lol:
     
  14. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    hes winding you up guys
     
  15. Toontoon

    Toontoon Boxing Junkie banned

    8,177
    1
    Jan 8, 2010
    Mayweather had hold of Mosley's arm for about 5 seconds more like.

    The ref could have let Mitchell carry on but I don't think he was going to see the round out as he didn't seem to know how to save himself in that situation.