If Mundine wis the IBF belt.....

Bernard Tomic is a ****.

 

WTF? why?

 

You know why.

 

It was known when geale went to fight sturm that he had to fight golovkin next or give up his title. And he gave it up, that is a bigger duck then choc not turning up to a purse bid against him. I believe they have both ducked him, yet when mundine did it, he wasn't a household name and wouldn't of got much credit anyhow. Yet when geale did it he gave up the chance to be a real big name in America, and a chance at another belt, only ibo though.

 

Careful with bringing facts into a Geale P4P wank fest thread. :yep

 

Lol

 

Hater. :nono

 

****ing hell, talk about pot and kettle.

Manny Siaca
Garth Wood

Mundine would not last 4 rounds with Canelo or Golovkin

Good work, you baited me good and proper :deal

 

He had the IBF belt which he would have had to defend by February from memory. What did Mundine have? nothing.

 

Post all the facts nuthugger. It was announced a day before the fight and AFTER the fight had been signed in late May so Geale was backed into a corner.

http://www.boxingnews24.com/2012/09/wba-orders-middleweight-title-resolution-by-december-31-2012/

No, Mundine was offered a shot at the vacant WBA Regular middleweight title and ran the other way despite all his talk. So according to you, if a no name beats another no name in America, that makes them a big nameatsch. GGG has **** all name in the USA so brush the mundine jizz from your eyes, fool. The intelligence of Mundine supporter is truly breathtaking

 

U know aswell as I know he had to fight soliman and he got out of that and I'm sure if he wanted he could of fought golovkin and the ibf wouldn't of stripped him. He ducked golovkin as much as anyone has

 

I'm confident Geale would beat Proksa. That's enough for me.
Styles make fights, so I can't say if he'd do it as easily or not.

I'm not denying that GGG isn't good talent, I'm just saying Geale can and will beat him if and when the time comes.

We'll agree to disagree, but no need to call me delusional because I think different to you.

 

As I said at the time if mundine beat golovkin, everyone Would of said he won another vacant title against someone who hasn't beaten anyone in the pro ranks. Would have got no credit for it. Yet where geale had the chance his the ibo champ just pasting ring magazine top 10 ranked proska and the name behind Martinez as the middleweight to beat. Geale turned down another chance to unify, yet u think that would mean nothing in America when geale could have 3 belts in America instead now having 1.

 

atsch **** me, you really are a dumb ****. The IBO?!? Really? Although being a Mundine nuthugger you would claim the IBO to be a credible organisation as mundine fans generally lack any sort of boxing knowledge. The IBO is not recognised by the WBA, WBC, IBF or The Ring so why would anyone bother trying to "unify" a piece of **** belt like that. Yes because the guy ranked third behind Martinez and Geale is the guy to beat after Martinez atsch:rofl:rofl? Geez, I can always count on Mundine nuthuggers for a good laugh! Golovkin fight with Proksa had one of the lowest view rates of the year for HBO, dumb****! So how would Geale get a name by beating someone who pulled one of the lowest view rates of the year for HBO. Also try replying in English this time. I can see why you follow Mundine as you both show a love for butchering the English language and spouting bull****.

 

So u agree with me that golovkin is rank 3rd best middleweight in the world, yet if geale beat him it would mean nothing? **** ur smart? Where was he rated when mundine was meant to fight him? It's not about being credible its bout geale having 3 titles right now instead of 1 over in America. U don't think Martinez would not come calling if he had ibf,WBA super, and a ibo. Now if geale wins he got ibf thats it.