If Nathan Cleverly wasnt good at LHW, why do so many top LHWs fight his former foes?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Mar 8, 2015.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    Now you have to invent shyte so that you can justify name calling. And not even a hint of a quotation of my post to justify your lie.


    poor show, I didn't mention joe there at all. Hans, are you Failey's alt? Because you are failing badly.
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    No hes not an alt, you are being pwned by 2 completely different posters
     
  3. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    lied to by 2 different ones, ok. That's twice the failey, you must be proud of doubling the original failure of Hans.

    I don't even need to reply to put you right, you guys do it to each other.
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    So you havent mentioned a fighter not relevant to this thread in several of your posts on this thread :patsch. You catch your own self out with your obsession
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010

    he lied, and you backed his lie about me up.

    he failed in his statement about me, and you failed in backing uphis lie.

    that's why you are called failey, isn't it?
     
  6. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Lied or didnt notice one of your posts, because I dont think it matters that much when it is without a doubt that you have mentioned a fighter not relevant to this thread. Do you deny that? Of course you will show yourself up and duck that question like a coward :oops:
     
  7. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    why should I deny a completely different question? I've mentioned calzaghe WHILST replying to Hans of course.but I didn't start it, he did and then denied it.....and you backed up his lie.


    So...why are you changing the goalposts?

    Why such an effort to cover up your attempts at lying?

    yeah you aint got away with this one.
     
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Yep theres the cowardly duck :lol:
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    there was no duck, I replied.


    Why are you calling a reply a duck? are you living in some topsy turvy land where reverse meanings apply to words?

    another lie from failey.
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    You didnt answer the question as predicted. Cowardly duck
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    nope, see below quote from me answering you - so you lied again! about your previous lie -


    now how about you quoting me where I initiated calzaghe into this thread? no? thought not. ok, your lies still stand until you do so.
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    You hanging round to be brave now?
    Look on the second page, and below is your full post, which is about Calzaghe and Calzaghe only, and not in any way related to Cleverly.
    There it is, your selfpwnage for all to see :lol::oops: